No industry in the history of industry has ever wanted a union.
post
The workers are the industry. The greedy shareholders are the problem.
Fuck the labour purchasers. The best time to unionise was decades ago, the next best time is right now. Fucking unionise now.
And help each other unionize!!!
Stealth mass unionize the company with a matrix community that helps coordinate everybody
Also making private unionized competitors to compete with stock non-unionized companies. The former will every time especially by making a better product, and take care of employees and customers
Let's fucking goooooo!!!!!!
Perhaps the majority of workers in the industry should have better say as opposed to the corpo parasites who want to suck the workforce dry of their net worth
Waay to go. UNIONIZE OR PERISH!
A Union would be nice for crap like this. If you make more than $27.63 they don't have to pay you overtime. I had a co worker that was asked to work overtime, like 13 years ago, and his contractor wasn't going to pay him overtime.
It's kind of dumb to say IT people want to union but "the industry" doesn't want to.
Guess "who" is the industry? Yeah, you are right, it's the IT people...
I don't know if it's just where I live but a lot of IT workers tend to be right leaning libertarians and want the "freedom" of being able to "negotiate on their terms."
I have always found it odd that tech/IT is not more unionized and supervised by some sort of professional order.
Doctors, nurses, construction workers, airline pilots etc are all deemed important trades and professions that require some form of professional order to supervise and attest the competency of the labor.
But for some reason IT is all like "you watched some Youtube videos, got certified by Cisco 15 years ago? All set to configure the security of our healthcare network". I am exaggerating obviously but still... IT is so intertwined in everything some sort of professional order would make sense. And union definitely.
Forming new professional bodies takes time, administration, and some kind of governance structure. There aren't a lot of grey-beards that have a bunch of spare time for organizing that. Also, historically, most IT people have seen themselves as "lone wolf frontiersmen" and the rate at which the industry has changed has made any kind of professional certification obsolete very quickly. Legal statutes, the frontiers of medicine, the best practices and techniques for pipe joining and bricklaying, etc. advance very slowly by comparison. Mature industries are much easier to unionize on average. IT is spectacularly immature (in multiple ways) by comparison so it's very hard to create a professional body to represent tech workers.
Would it be good if we had something like that? Yes. Is it going to be easy to build, hell no. A better model might be the development of independent tech co-operatives, with distributed ownership. If a bunch of senior software engineers with some spare cash to pool creating a bunch of major tech competitors with a co-operative ownership model might actually serve the industry much better than the centralized corporate model we find ourselves subject to, AND provide a basis for developing industry unions, but the closest the industry has to something like that at a large scale is... well Valve, and even that's not a true co-operative.
Professional certification bodies work best in industries with slow pace of change, e.g., civil engineering. In IT it's an obstacle. We'd all be taking exams on COBOL or CORBA, and that would be just more unaccountable gatekeeping.
Also other than a few outliers (gaming) IT and development jobs have been pretty good in recent history. There hasn't been much push for change until the circumstances shifted.
Valid point. Thus far, tech workers in general have had a pretty comfortable relationship with the executive class by comparison to other industries. That made it a little to easy to dismiss the risks of being that cozy with them without some kind of protection.
The industry never wants it.
They should have unionized 20 years ago when it was easy instead of crowing about how useless the humanities were.
My union made my healthcare much better and is the reason behind my raise. Its great!
WHAT? I'm shocked. I like dancing with AI and training them to make me homeless
What I hate about IT is that you have to wear multiple hats. Not unique to IT in the slightest, but IT often has to do weird shit that IMO should not be at all in the job description. Management for some reason is convinced IT should be ok with doing physical labor to move shit around, should be ok to be part time logistics department, should be part time project manager, should be part time janitor, should be like HR, should be sales people, should be public speaker, should be part time QA, should be part time in legal, etc etc etc. It's fucking ridiculous.
I just want to work with the tech. Get the people out of the fucking way. All I want is the tech ffs. It's in my fucking title.
Omg, this. The part time legal thing is happening to me right now.
I’m building a small app for a (multimillion dollar) company. Nothing major. I tell the project manager: “hey, you guys need a EULA to publish in the app store. You can use the std apple one or write your own. Tell me what you want to do.”
This woman comes back to me with: “what do you think we should do?”
Like b#%^!, I don’t know! Why would you want me to tell you how define the legal relationship between you and your customers?
After some prodding, she forwards the request to legal and sends back a DRAFT EULA asks: “Can you review this?”
NO. I cannot review legal documents. I’m horrendously under qualified for that!!!
/end rant
The reason that IT often gets lumped with this stuff is because if you leave it to anybody else they do it wrong especially logistics.
Everyone except the IT department is now banned from ordering new IT equipment because they'll order a bunch of laptops and then act all surprised when this huge pallet of devices arrives as if they didn't just order one. So then it just sits in the entrance lobby the days on end until someone from IT comes and opens the pallet and takes the laptops upstairs. If they do that with new pens that's fine, no one's going to steal them.
The thing is: that's my favorite part about it. I'm sitting at a keyboard for five hours, then I spend a week building shit with my hands-not low level building shit, but still fun, then I'm talking to grandma doing troubleshooting.
If everything else about it weren't a nightmare shit show where you're the devil if someone else fucks up in a year, I'd be very happy in that kind of career.
It's a scam by big cap to exploit you for small pay.
No brother, it's not. They scammed you into believing you should be a SME in unrelated things that legit have nothing to do with IT. Stop letting them exploit you.
Thanks for raising another red flag I hate about my work: single points of failure. lmao
Value yourself more, brother. The rich CEO don't care about you. I promise.
Guess who can be replaced in the long run: a company or a skilled person?
I just lost my union a couple months ago, they still exist I guess the government decided they didn't want some of us to have a union going forward.
UNIONIZE
Living wage, universal basic income. The cure for failing capitalism. If this happened, the entire population can now be included in the system, rather than marginalized and pushed further away.
Of course the industry doesn’t want them to unionize. That’s like half the reason to do it.
I've been in IT for 20 years, I have published books, regularly speak at conferences, been recognized by industry leading companies as one of the top experts in the world, and I've made solutions that have made my company millions of dollars. Yet, I have constant fear of being laid off. I know I'm seriously underpaid, my last pay hike came when I was on a call with one of our internal recruiters and they let it split that a job posting we were working on would X amount, which was about $20k below what I was making.
The sad thing is I've been looking on and off for the past 2 years. I've had a couple of offers, but they have all tried to low-ball me at the last minute or lied about the job actually being remote. But over the past few weeks, I've seen less and less jobs actually getting posted. A year ago when I would check LinkedIn and there was hundreds of jobs posted daily. Today, one of my searches returned 4 jobs and another returned zero. On top of that 90% of the ones that are posted are from shady recruiters just trying to collect your data.
All that is to say, yes please! But I haven't actually heard anyone talk about unions.
Join Tech Workers Coalition, What We Will or any other tech alt-labor organization in your area. There are plenty of tech workers talking about unions.
That is depressing seeing the defunct chapters on the Tech Workers Coalition website. Especially in places like Austin and San Jose. What is "What We Will"? I'm not finding anything searching for that.
It's a spin-off of TWC, now independent, focused on layoff support and advocacy: https://wwwrise.org/
We really need IT unions to begin to politicize, eventually radicalize, those guys. It's a glaring deficiency of the left. We need our people at the cloud, servers, AI, service, etc.
Main solution is building new companies that are private unionized.
For existing stock companies they would have to be stealth mass unionized.
No industry has ever wanted unions.
All companies should live under the constant threat of unionization. Tech is no exception.
Nope, Unions should be sector based, not company based or site based.
I have been part of the white collar union here for 15+ years now, so far I have not really had to use them, but I'll happily pay my dues for the membership.
Also, sympathy strikes should be legal everywhere.
But it's functionally the same for an individual company - the fear at least.
Nope, a sector based union have far, far more power and resources than a site or company based union, simply due to having far more members.
One of my favourite unions stories was when Toys 'R Us wanted to get into the Swedish market.
First of all, you might not realize it, but Sweden has a highly unregulated labour market, we have no minimum wage and the government doesn't really interfere in the labour market.
Our system is based on our strong unions negotiating with employers and employer organizations.
The vast majority of medium and large workplaces have signed collective bargaining agreements with the largest unions, for the most part it is a formality, but a very important one, with consequences if the parties fail to come to an agreement. There have been several times with large strikes, that closed or severely reduced services due to this, these negotiations and especially the strikes does show up on the national news.
Anyway, Toys 'R Us refused to sign a CBA with the store workers union, and hired staff that wasn't in a union instead, this is allowed, so the union called a strike against TRU.
Well, other unions saw this and wasn't happy, and started sympathy strikes, the transport workers union refused to deliver goods to TRU stores, the financial workers union refused to process payments for TRU, the printer workers union refused to print materials for TRU and do on.
All of this successfully pushed TRU back to the negotiation table, and finally got them to sign a CBA.
As soon as that was done, the sympathy strikes ended.
There are a lot of times I wished I could have told my boss I wouldn’t do something stupid and had the backing of a union.
“If you make me store passwords in plaintext we all walk.”
Of course the industry doesn't want it. But the workers are the ones with the power to make it happen.
no comments (yet)