A woman who previously dated Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said he drunkenly forced her to have sex after she told him to stop, according to a Politico report released Monday, leading prominent supporters to pull their endorsements and throwing a must-win race for the party into turmoil.

Platner denied the allegation, but said he would be considering next steps for his campaign.

“Regardless of the inaccuracy of the reporting but mindful of the political reality it will inflict, we’re taking the time to reflect on the best path forward,” he said in a video released on social media.

Jenny Racicot, who lives in Maine, told Politico that Platner entered her home in 2021 while drunk and assaulted her. Racicot said she had been in an on-and-off relationship with Platner, but she cut off contact with him after that night and told him the incident wasn’t consensual. A voicemail left at a number listed for Racicot seeking comment did not receive an immediate response.

Platner’s campaign did not immediately respond to an email and phone message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

“Any accusation of non-consensual behavior is categorically false,” Platner said in his video.

Still, the allegation sparked a flight away from a candidate who has long been controversial. Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who’d stood by Platner even as the insurgent candidate was hit with prior allegations, said Monday’s was enough. “I’ve been very clear that sexual assault or violence against women is a red line,” Khanna said. “These allegations are very serious and credible. Graham Platner should drop out from the race. I am withdrawing my endorsement.”

Edit: holy shit, these comments are insane.

Regardless of what you believe with this, Platner likely cannot win anymore. He has a week to do the right thing and drop out before he's fully locked in. If he actually gives any sort of a shit (and doesn't just want power, like rapists seeking office tend to), he needs to drop out yesterday.

This is the nail in the coffin for his campaign. It's not time to defend him no matter what, because there's still a week where a new candidate can be put into place. Instead of being mad at people not wanting to vote for him, you should start vocally supporting another candidate.

top 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 66 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 38 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The double standards for each party is absolutely stunning.

    Anyone even know off the top their head how many allegations, some even confirmed in FBI testimony, Don chomo has?

    Not to mention the rape scrotus said he had to pay out.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago*

    Exactly. If our esteemed representatives in DC gave even a fraction of this same shit about an actual habitual pedophile and rapist -- of his wife Ivanka, other children, and quite possibly his own daughter -- sitting in the highest office in the land, what a different country we'd have today.

    Some do, certainly, and I don't want to dishonor the very real efforts of some on both sides to see the truth come out.

    But as a whole, their concern about Graham Platner rings hollow as fuck. And at this point I'd vote for fucking Pol Pot raised from the dead before I voted for that dinosaur Susan Collins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago

    “The major problem—one of the major problems, for there are several—one of the many major problems with governing people is that of whom you get to do it; or rather of who manages to get people to let them do it to them. To summarize: it is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it. To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.”

    ― Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe

    Just hold a lottery for the senate / house seat. No politics, no filtering.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    Coming out exactly a week before the candidate can be switched makes this fishy...

    If they wanted a real investigation, they'd have said it earlier. And if he is guilty, he can just pull a Cuomo and run anyways.

    But if he's innocent and cares most about beating Republicans, he might drop anyways like Al Franken.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    Yuuurp. And 90% of people (even on here) are eating it up. Subverting primaries is a Dem past time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    If it's this easy to sling allegations around then progressive candidates everywhere are fucked.

    Why bother voting when you can just accuse a candidate of rape? It's super effective, apparently. Unless they're a republican, at least...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (9 children)

    Crazy thing about this is that there are just enough details that I believe it is real, but just enough missing pieces that it puts it in doubt...

    • Platner was supposedly drunk af and according to Racicot and didn't remember anything the next day, so it would be plausible Platner himself can't recall anything about the incident.
    • All the messages she sent to Platner are gone (Does he still have them? Platner never getting the messages and Platner hiding those messages are both plausible possibilities.)
    • No official records of the incident, just her telling her therapist, boyfriend, and other friend, and the boyfriend repeated the story to Politico.
    • Some fb message exchange with the other friend released, claims it was in 2023 but we can't see the date.
    • We don't have the emails with dates, just Politico's descriptions of them.
    • The NYT didn't confirm nor deny whether Racicot was one of the other accusers that spoke in more vague terms about his behaviour.

    Yes, this is a piece that can make plenty of people feel vindicated about their hunches on Platner. But the way this came out and how the media jumped on this story while it has passed over oodles of testimony of Trump committing sexual assault, I can equally understand people being suspicious as well. And it is a playbook that can be trotted out whether there is a true story behind it or not, anytime there is a Democratic candidate for a position that didn't come from a prestigious institution with everything given to them on a silver platter.

    People are crying for "average" people to be part of government, this is an average person we got from Maine and now many are getting upset. People who haven't had anything happen that could be construed as scandalous from their high school prom to now, where a story like this could credibly be denied, are shut-ins like me who aren't interested in dating and wouldn't seriously think to run in politics, or are well-educated with above-average wealth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Yeah, people make it way too easy for the entrenched powers to manipulate them. At this point if the republicans hold onto a thin senate majority, I won't have any sympathy for the dumbass voters who fell for such a transparent tactic again.

    We won't be able to fix our broken system until we stop proving that uncorroborated mudslinging works better than actually offering good policy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    People are crying for “average” people to be part of government, this is an average person we got from Maine and now many are getting upset. People who haven’t had anything happen that could be construed as scandalous from their high school prom to now, where a story like this could credibly be denied, are shut-ins like me who aren’t interested in dating and wouldn’t seriously think to run in politics, or are well-educated with above-average wealth.

    Your argument is that there are so many rapists amongst average people that we have no choice but to elect them?

    There are a lot of people who date and don't rape people.

    Jesus Christ.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I'm not saying every average person is a rapist, but since it's a common enough experience (21% of women) despite underreporting: https://www.nsvrc.org/statistics/statistics-depth/, I'm saying most people could be believably accused of an incident like this happening in their lifetime. And people who have been long scrutinized in a political career or from an elite institution will tend to be able to stay clear of incidents like these.

    And it's an entirely separate issue, that unless Platner steps down, the election is currently a choice between him and an incumbent Senator that at best might say she is concerned about women's rights being taken away but will do nothing, and at worst will support a party that plans to take even more rights away from women, including the right to vote. If one wants to hold a consistent position as to "blue no matter who", the same applies for a potential rapist as it does a bland corporate dem, as it does a former policewoman, as it does a Muslim democratic socilaist.

    Listen, as more info comes out verifying the claims from the Politico article or perhaps other revelations I think Platner may be best to step down. That's his choice to make, but I think we should be measured when evaluating every accusation and claim of whatever nature, instead of getting in a frenzy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (5 children)

    I agree he should step down. I don't think it's helpful to push that this is the best representation we can find from average people. I've always been against "vote blue no matter who" for exactly these types of scenarios.

    If one wants to hold a consistent position as to “blue no matter who”, the same applies for a potential rapist as it does a bland corporate dem, as it does a former policewoman, as it does a Muslim democratic socilaist.

    We shouldn't hold the position of "vote blue no matter who". I can't believe the discussion we're all having is that we should vote for a rapist and that the ends justifies the means.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    You don't need to hold that position, I can tell that you haven't and I respect that. It is, however a position that can be held amongst many opinions. My point is that, if it was employed in one of the other cases I mentioned, it should be employed here to avoid hypocrisy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    I'd rather be a hypocrite than knowingly support putting a rapist in a position of power.

    That's why that position is inherently flawed. Because we end up supporting people just like MAGA does.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Again, I respect that. Feel free to give yourself a pat on the back for the unflawed principles upon which you stand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Oh come on, I was conversing respectfully back and forth with you and you just had to throw in that sarcastic jab at the end.

    Yeah I fucking will for the bare minimum of not actively supporting rapists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    I don't want to sound like a broken record, I'm sincerely stating that your stance, while different than (but not opposite to) mine, is valid and good. I can clarify my stance if you so wish, otherwise I am happy to end the conversation there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    And discrediting and disbelieving rape victims is a past time shared by all political spectrums.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    Fine. I have a solution that should make everyone happy. We elect Platner now. In turn, he promises to resign as soon as a credible and progressive candidate can be selected that will share his values. Platner can endorse that person, then the whole state can pressure Janet Mills to appoint that person after Platner resigns. He can win the election and then resign the day he's sworn in.

    "Believe rape victims" does not mean "hand the race to a corporatist Dem or a Republican."

    This would satisfy things, wouldn't it? Platner wouldn't actually get to serve a Senate term. Justice would be served. Yet, somehow, I think justice may not be your actual highest priority.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That's what did it? Not the Nazi shit?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    If Platner wants to defend himself publicly on this, and/or keep running, and/or sue the accuser for libel, he's free to do any or all of that. As anyone who's been around for a few cycles know, its pretty common for candidates and other public figures, when they first reach a certain terminal level of attention or fame, to get a wide range of accusations on business, personal matters, drug use, and past sexual behavior. Just because these appear to be conveniently timed politically, is not evidence for or against their veracity. If there is no actual juice to these accusations, then dealing with people who lob bombs like that into the middle of campaigns is a well-worn playbook that thousands of politicians have run and won with, and he'll be fine. If.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Very much with the "if." I'd rather not add more logs to the everlasting bonfire of "women ignored for political expediency." If it is fake, then handle it like a normal person instead of self-destructing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Another aspect as to why this is different is because it's so well substantiated. It's like... Textbook. There's so little to argue with.

    The previous claims against him had none of that, and came from his direct opposition. That is suspicious. These claims are not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago*

    Sad situation. Either way AIPAC won America lost

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Called this. Haha down voters.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    It’s wild the literal bragging of killing people wasn’t the final straw. Or the SS symbol he walked around with that he IMMEDIATELY covered when it came to light. 18 fucking years with a Nazi tattoo after Blackwater.

    Also seeing bunch of liberals denying this poor woman who is a victim, blueMAGA really would vote for a rapist like Trump if he was a democrat. It goes from “I believe women” to “well, not her she’s lying” REAL fucking fast for these so called “progressives”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    When you only look at a person's policies like they're a checklist, you open yourself up to being manipulated.

    Donald 'anti-war' Trump, Fetterman, Senima, etc. You need to judge people by their character or else you're going to look like a dumbshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    You think Donald Trumps policy is actually anti war? Not his words his POLICY. Also he’s a pedophile like Bill Clinton, y’all forgot Bill groomed teenager that worked for him, and that’s what we do know. Am I not supposed to look at that “check list”?

    I am judging Platner PURLEY on his character, and honestly this whole thing is making me judge other white American leftists in the same way. If you think Platners cool manly military dude thing is good character you fell for the American exceptionalist bullshit hook, line and sinker.

    He’s literally a rapist murderer. That’s not a checklist buddy. Don’t you even dare to try to tell me you don’t believe the victim of him here. Rape apologists and “no proof” sexism & I will block you

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›