And they achieved... what exactly?
More faces per book? Instant Instagram? Whatsapp is now appier? Finally copied Second Life in meta horizons?
Like... What does $221,000,000/month of AI even get you?
And they achieved... what exactly?
More faces per book? Instant Instagram? Whatsapp is now appier? Finally copied Second Life in meta horizons?
Like... What does $221,000,000/month of AI even get you?
Is that cost in electricity cost? Or they are not using their own AI models?
They have their own models, it depends on a teams manager and a few other constraints if they are required to use them or if they are pestered to use generative models at all.
I'm betting that cost is just the cost for the token usage and nothing else.
Meta is not using their own models internally because their internal models are far behind the state of the art.
This is why Zuck is in a frenzy too, trying desperately to catch up, failing consistently to actually do so
im required to use ai at my job. they don't pay attention to what i do with it. so it now answers my emails 1 business day after i receive them, and responds (appropriately) that im working on their request and ill check back in with them with progress. its a constant loop.
its funny how many tasks in corporate america get forgotten bc they weren't executed immediately :D
corporate elsewhere too. it's all for The Metrics, to see usage and adaptation go up. i'm not required to use it at work, but our developers are.
let's just say clients are increasingly choosing the (worse) fallback browser version of our service instead of the vibecoded and more and more broken app full of vulnerabilities. because at least the browser side has issues they expect and usually know by now.
but hey, new graph go up, right? ignore the old graph we cared about before.
my fav is the fact that our dev team is use 80% of the companys ai tokens, but have to push to production at least four times bc of bug fixes. every week. we used to publish once, maybe twice.
somehow this is better?
Surprisingly difficult to find a source on this that isn't a Twitter Screenshot of some right-wing grifter's account.
This seems to be it, but I don't think there's currently a working paywall bypass for the information (solid site, though).
https://mlq.ai/news/meta-caps-internal-ai-token-spending-after-costs-approach-billions-in-2026/
This might be that article, but not entirely sure. Ironically, that site seems to be another questionable AI project.
We've been seeing posts of people using AI for stupid stuff because their bosses wanted to show their bosses that they were all in on AI.
Now that they've effectively churned the waters for effect, the companies have realized that - Surprise! - there was no result. Now they want AI used for real stuff, which is what they should have been doing in the first place. Companies got way out over their skis way too early on this one.
And the AI companies made billions, and they're still broke, and years away from profitability, if ever. And viability, if ever.
Imagine you have to go on with a company name that is the worst failure in your company's history? Every time you say the company name, you are referencing what a loser you are.
the metaverse
But did you see the legs? Impressive.
I'd like to join the chorus of people saying "Zuckerberg will be bankrupt soon", but I said the same thing about Musk and he became a trillionaire
People will continue to use his dumb products, not in the least cause he does his best to monopolize any market he's in
Is this whole token thing really just the same as paid in-game currencies, just designed to get you to not think about the fact that you’re spending money? Or is there another use for it?
Tokens are pretty much the compute used for one word, approximately, or some other information of a similar size. (Long words are two or three tokens each actually)
Then, yes those tokens are paid for with "credits" which is them gamifying the purchase lol
Tokens are an AI context of units of text. Could be a character or a word. Why use the term tokens instead of words? Who knows. Maybe because some units aren’t words? The tech industry delights in creating stupid terms for things that already had terms.
and that is not even the actual cost, because the vendors are still not making a profit.
Observe the dead-eyed stare into the middle distance.
He almost looks human in that photo.
And the marketplace search is still a broken pile of shit...wish everyone didn't jump to it and stayed on CL...
I hope Cuckerberg is bankrupt at the end of this AI clusterfuck.
I'm sure making Instagram clog my feed with suggested posts and other shit I don't follow has done wonders for their engagement metrics. I really love how meme posts and other shares are now clogging that shit up as well.
It's definitely not a main contributor to what made me finally delete my Facebook. Kind of ironic that, given how much of my data they scrape, they still couldn't piece that together.
Unfortunatly in the heart of empire they pick the winners and losers ..... news flash the losers become winners.
There are more than 7.000 AI apps out there, most used are all from big corps (Gargle, M$, Zuckerbot, etc), meanwhile there are pretty good and private indie alternatives which are struggeling to survive. That is the real problem, not the AI as tool as such, but those which biased these for own greedy advantages, to profile and manipulate the user. Adding users which use it without criterio and knowledge to substitute with it own research and brain, instead of an tool which can help with research and work, using it for what it is.
all 60 comments