all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Now, if there were justice in this world the entire command chain that devised and executed the plan would be fired and their CV would be forever tainted.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    I hope all those workers remember that Ford threw them out the absolute first second they could. I'd be looking elsewhere immediately.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    Jesus christ, stop posting this story. It's ridiculous.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    At severely reduced wages, of course

  • source
  • 10 comments in c/world view that post
    [–] 19 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    That's gotta be one hell of a raise for those folks

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Hope they played it right. I knew someone who worked on proprietary factory machines and he always refused to train anyone else on them and got paid stupid amounts to service them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I know an engineer that does very well because he services systems originally programmed in Fortran.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    What... Of Fortran that old already?

    Damn, I am that old already....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Another Klarna moment.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Should not the AI be used to perform the work without errors

    You cannot inspect quality into a product just find faults for rework and identify process improvements.

    QA vs QC, but then again the good ole USA does not differentiate, it is all QA to them!

    QA Inspector as a role ROFL! Really?

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    "We recognised that for us to enhance some of our automation and machine learning and artificial intelligence tools we needed to ensure that they were trained by the most experienced individuals,"

    Surely, this means Ford will spend more time getting engineers to train AI and then they will fire them again.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    We will see. The point is that Large Language Models cannot produce anything that is not a copy of the work of someone else, while Ford engineers need to be creative to design new cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    Probably some engineers to make a new vehicle platform-

    Then instead of multiple teams turning the platform into multiple vehicles with multiple trim levels, you'll have a single team that makes one vehicle or a few different classes of vehicle on a platform then the 'AI' does the rest.

    To use VW as an example-

    • One senior engineering team at VW or Porsche designs the platform (ie. MQB)

    • One or few junior engineering team(s) at VW designs vehicles (ie. VW Golf, Jetta, Tiguan)

    • A few specialty vehicles get all-human treatment (ie. 911)

    • A marketing team at Audi, Skoda, etc will design their generational design language

    • The rest is 'AI' generated from the platform, vehicle type and desired design language.

    Stripping VW Group of multiple engineering teams, mostly outside Germany.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    We will see if they can achieve firing many engineers in the next round, but from what they openly say there that is their plan. It is unlikely they will ever get rid of all engineers, but using AI as an excuse, redundancies seems what they want. Not about the same level of expertise, but factory workers are widely used to train the LLMs that will replace them. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jun/24/indian-factory-workers-told-film-themselves-for-ai-robots

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    ... getting engineers to train AI and then they will fire them again.

    it makes you wonder what those ford guys are like; knowing that this is going to happen, but they rejoin ford anyways.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    Who could have predicted that the slop machine would be sloppy

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    Surplus value can only be created by surplus labour. It is an objective structural imperative of Capitalism for employees to stay longer to create value for shareholders.

    LLMs have the potential to shorten socially necessary labor time, but under capitalism, this potential is perverted into a means of intensifying exploitation and increasing alienation.

  • source
  • 2 comments in c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se view that post
    [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    It just seems like we're destroying everything for one "product" 🙄 that doesn't even add any value to LITERALLY ANYTHING.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Sadly it seems their lesson learned is to rehire only until they can assimilate those experts knowledge more thoroughly, then cut them once again

    Lather, rinse, repeat throughout industries

    Not the feel good story the headline would hope you would have read

    Cannot hate AI enough

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/technology@lemmy.zip view that post
    [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I bet they are treated worse now even still.

  • source