the story of Peter’s lesson is “don’t say anything unless you’re ABSOLUTELY sure”

What? HOW did you get that? The lesson is that if you get caught in a pattern of obvious lies, your credibility will be shot and people won't believe your word even if the next time you tell the truth. I struggle to imagine how you managed to misunderstand an anecdote meant for children.

The boy who cried wolf is a simple progression of cause to effect. Again, it's meant to be so simple and intuitive that a child can understand it. In comparison, Cassandra is ancient mythology that is centered on divine intervention. If a child asks why nobody believed her and you tell "because God made it so", or Serstan forbid go into the rabbit hole of institutionalized sexism (and try to apply a modern Western perspective to an ancient Greek story), how do they draw a morale from that? That's why it isn't told as frequently.

Or maybe it's because Peter's tale has a clear lesson about lying too much while Cassandras tale has no clear lesson. Because what's the lesson that even a 5 year old would understand? That telling the truth is useless if nobody listens? That's a bad lesson.

If both stories are gender neutral, it’s more or less the same meaning. Why are you even focusing on the genders?

You’re making irrelevant details important so you can be mad.

It’s a made up story about gods, I’m sure most of the world can relate to that situation eh?

The person is literally cursed, it’s not because they’re female, it’s because they are cursed. There’s always ways to interpret stories differently I guess.

No, non invented stories with non god or mythology creatures always have a more meaningful and relatable message.

It’s nothing to do with misogyny lmfao. It’s a hardly believable story, its gods. Come on.