top 82 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

So many absurd things that I was told "you'll understand/agree when you're older" that turned out to just be boomer copium.

No, I don't hate taxes (the opposite). No, I'm not more conservative (the opposite).

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    One thing I've noticed about boomers is the constant TV on in the background. Very commonly FOX news, or newsmax these days, cnn, etc. Their world view is absolutely shaped by their media diet.

    Meanwhile, our generation has always had the Internet. We view the world through that lens, which has a bit more of an expanded view, especially since people from those "scary" countries can come on places like reddit and post. Which is why I think the push for AI has been so strong. Now the Epstein class have some sort of means to taint what we read online, slowly moving our own worldview to the one the boomers have had from their own propaganda. It used to take owning the news stations to push their agenda, but now they had to pivot to now posting via bots to get their messages in.

    All this to say, I think we had a nice gap where a kinder worldview emerged for some generations, but I worry that the generation growing up with the internet how it is becoming is going to slip back into the boomer thinking if it continues this way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 4 months ago

    Their strategy for corrupting the youth has been promoting a vapid hyper capitalist hustle culture and signal boosting influencers who embody that depravity. However, unlike the boomers of yore, the economy we face is terrible and only getting worse, with none of us having any personal wealth left to protect. They're going hard into fascism in an effort to redirect the anger, but even that has a limited half life. Eventually they're gonna need to start cannibalizing each other in mass movements against other elites, because we need somebody to pay and they need to make it not them. I forsee war in some form as an inevitability.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    What's even more wild is to ask a religious leader for a religion that says "don't kill people" about how killing people in a war isn't a sin. I was only a child when I saw one of my peers ask a priest this. The mental gymnastics the priest was trying to pull was blatantly obvious to me, even as a kid.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    It all makes perfect sense when you realize that the "don't kill people" part only meant "don't kill fellow tribesmen". Non-tribesmen were 100% fair game. The God of that religion commanded multiple genocides against other tribes.

    You run into the same problems with said religion and slavery. The whole "it was different and more indentured servitude than chattel slavery" was only for inside the tribe. Chattel slavery was explicitly allowed for the non-tribesman.

    Modern religious leaders may be uncomfortable with this and have to perform some Olympic level mental gymnastics, but that is just because ethics and values have changed slightly in 2000 or so years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Some people genuinely deserve it. So here is the best-intent version in all its escalating absurdity:

    The problem is who gets to crown themselves the judge of who deserves to die, which is why judicial systems exist, but who assigns the judges? So then you need an external mandate or a consensus mechanism in place, long story short, you get a ruler with a divine mandate, a parliament/jury consensus system, or an AI swarm convergence mechanism depending on the era you’re currently crossing.

    But then you can’t trial the chief of another tribe/country/swarm for crimes they committed which aren’t wrong at all according to their values, like say, a Muslim marrying a first cousin wouldn’t be doing something wrong according to their moral system, but it would be a big taboo in the USA and the west. So if you’re say, a pious chieftain, and you wanted to take the stuff from the next tribe over, just start thinking smart, think of the letter not the spirit. You got all you need.

    And now you know why an army is a national survival necessity, and why even religions themselves aren’t safe from a politician, whom they sometimes have to kill.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 76 points 4 months ago*

    Joining a military that aggresses other nations? Yeah, spot on. Joining a military to defend your line on the ground against people you see as fellow earthlings? Still a fair take. Joining a military to defend against people who want you dead because of how you were born? That's where this starts to unravel. That kind of stuff sadly exists in this world.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    As someone pointed out, this is understandable if you're from the USA.

    Otherwise, I see it like this:

    • Every country has an army.

    • Their own, or the one of another country.

    The baseline is that going to war is bad, having a defensive army is absolutely not (and will prevent deaths as russia won't dare attack you).

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [+] [S] -9 points 4 months ago* (8 children)

    Having a formidable army has clearly not deterred global superpowers from attacking you, especially if they get too cocky like in Iran and Ukraine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Neither Ukraine nor Iran had a "formidable" army when they were attacked.

    Russia was supposedly the second army in the world too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Iran has long possessed the ability to survive decapitation and respond to an existential threat by closing the strait. It's why no US President tried it before now. Ukraine was more of a surprise than Iran, but Russia not realizing that their own neighbor wouldn't be a pushover the second time was still a danger that they could've foreseen. In both cases, deterrence didn't work because the invaders were greedy and irrationally confident.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    And?

    Still didn't have "formidable" armies.

    And sincerely your "being cocky" smells like kremlin apology sauce, you sincerely don't think Ukraine is at fault in any kind of way for the 2014 invasion or the 2022 full scale invasion?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I don't know why you think I was saying Ukraine was at fault for once again being the target of Russian imperialism. If anything, I'm giving them more credit than you are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    No you don't, because you have no idea how much credit I give the Ukrainian people, which if you wonder is around astronomical.

    You can also just accept and say "ah yeah they didn't have formidable armies. I was thinking about how it went after the invasions." But that's too hard for some people I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    The police are made to oppress your own citizens while the military is made to oppress foreign citizens

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 4 months ago

    When I was young people around me told me that the further west on the map country is, the wealthiest and more free people live there without any conflict bothering them. With USA (the west-most country on map) as a shiny utopia with everyone peacefully living there being rich and free.

    When I was a teen and my country joined EU I saw countless young adults emigrate west, seeking wealth and freedom beyond anyone's wildest dreams. Terrorists and oppressive regimes waged war in the eastern lands.

    When I am an adult, the supposed peacekeeper of the world is waging wars to protect pedophiles. Former empire where sun never sets is trying to outlaw being young and sell their citizens data to highest bidder. And EU is bi-yearly trying to pass universal invigilation act.

    I feel like my moral compass never really changed, it's just the world around me that changed beyond recognition. I worry how it will be when I get old, if I even get to live to old age.

    Hang in there, buddy, it's rough but we are all in this together.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    You don't get it - there are lots of natural resources there!

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    As a teen I talked to people from all around the world, usually connected by our shared fandoms. I remember talking to a girl in California who said she wanted to join the military when she grew up. Apparently she came from a military family, and couldn't understand why I was appalled at the idea of choosing such a path. We discussed it civilly, and eventually agreed to disagree. I can't help but wonder if she went through with it and, if so, how she feels about it today.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You shouldn't agree to disagree with people who want to oppress and kill millions of innocents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I'm curious what the alternative to "agree to disagree" is.

    Agree to agree? Refuse to agree? Refuse to disagree?

    Either you convince someone to change their mind or you don't. If you don't convince them then you either keep trying past the point where it is clearly futile or you stop trying. If both sides of a disagreement stop trying then they've agreed that they disagree.

    Oh! I did think of an alternative. You could pretend to agree and secretly disagree. Is that what you are suggesting is preferable?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Violence literally just creates more violence.

    Like this stupid pointless fucking Iraq war. Even if dumbfuck somehow "wins", which its clear will never happen, do they not realize all the destruction done by the US is just going to create yet another ISIS/Al Queda/whatever style terrorist organization as retatiation?

    Then it'll be "oh boy, gotta kill more brown people in the desert!"

    Wash, rinse, repeat...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Probably. Frankly, all these countries just feel like a rerun of the same endless bull shit at this point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    They're distinct countries with their own unique challenges, cultures, and agendas. Simply viewing them as a blanket middle eastern "enemy" to America is a big part of the problem. The only important thing these "enemies" have in common is that America needs to keep them divided, lest the Arab world coalesces into a superpower to rival the greatest. That said, it's not just outside meddling making that difficult; these countries have qualitative differences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    You are not wrong. On any level. Like I said, the endless nonsense is just... endless. Itnhas "We have always been aw war with Eurasia" vibes, because that is basically the point pushed by the constant nonsense. Can't let these countries become stronger or unified or whatever. They are just always "the enemy", "terrorists", Muslims" etc.

    And I am.not saying I agree with thst mindset at all, it just followa with what you said about the US constantly over there.

    And it goes with the idea that war in general is just fucking stupid and never solves shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    You will get the murder and destruction when you grow up kid. It all makes sense once you become part of the machine /S

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Same thing with profiteering, entrepreneurism, "the need for growth" etc, basically all the bullshit our education system forced on us to justify capitalism and making the rich richer.

    Like, no, definitely when I grew up I would somehow understand that its OK to screw people over and hoard resources for one stinky asshole while millions of people starve and die of curable diseases? Loooool nope obvious lie is obvious. I'm here now and I feel old and tired, choosing to fuck people over is still wrong and trashy.

    I'd be less bitter about it if so many other people hadn't bought into it...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • And suprise, suprise, House always wins.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This and the electoral college. Even 12 year old me was like this shit is fucked right?? Only to be told by adults how stupid I was… smh

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 43 points 4 months ago* (10 children)

    I mean self-defense is not bad. US is just not defending itself from anyone.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    If only we had countless examples from history of people successfully defending themselves without a military...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Haiti's independence war, the October revolution, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the Irish independence movement, the French revolution, India's independence guerillas, Indonesia's independence guerillas, women's rights movements (including suffragette terrorism), the Black Panthers, Christians in the Roman empire, Al Qaeda fighting off NATO, ...

    I'm not suggesting pacifism, I'm suggesting decentralized violence that isn't at the command of a state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Ah, bespoke artisanal violence. That's the difference

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Unironically, yes. Shape the tools of violence for the situation, keep them in the hands of those they are meant to defend, and suddenly it's a lot less evil.

    It's the same way your grandma knitting you a scarf is less evil than a sweatshop knitting you one.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    That only works for internal resistance I believe? Like, Ukrainians can't defend against the Kremlin with a sitting strike

    However, we definitely need more sitting strikes nowadays. We've grown complacent in exchange for small pleasantries

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Sure. Let yourself become "internal" and then assassinate and terror-bomb and sabotage them. I wasn't suggesting pacifism, I was suggesting not outsourcing your "self-defense" to a state.

    Militaries can never give you self-defense, they can only give self-defense to themselves, more specifically military high command. Or the military-industrial complex if you're feeling fancy. You are a source of taxes, morale, and manpower.

    One thing to remember is that the alternative to a military is being able to spend all the money and resources and labor and life that was going to the military on other projects. Even spending it all on self-defense if need be.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    itt: people justifying why their institution of mass murder is actually good

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Everyone in this thread is forgetting about the evil✋ALIENS🤚that may or may not exist.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    I was once asked why I joined the military and my answer was 'l needed money'. This seemed to shock my companion who was astounded that I was willing to potentially kill people over money. My response was that it was a far better reason than for imaginary friends or the colour of their skin.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Still a terrible reason and it makes you an awful person to be a mercenary for imperialism to kill innocents for bourgeois profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    Never denied I was an awful person. Also, not in the American military.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Canada isn't any better. Edit: Why is this being down voted when the comment under is being upvoted I looked at their profile they are candadian they say this multiple times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Killing people is bad and war is bad and the military is evil and the only way to stop it is to use the military to do a war and kill people.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (5 children)

    Most people don't understand the concept of the industrial military complex. There is only one way forward to end the madness and that is to dismantle this system permanently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Amen. But unfortunately, a lot of that dismantling will have to be done at gunpoint.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    You are not going to be able to stop this with a game of whack a mole. I am not a fan of a violent solution, but if done it would have to be universal all at once since this concept has already spread to every nation in the world.

    Without a doubt an industry that can only grow from death and destruction is inherently a threat to human life. Couple that with fascism and you have a government that conspires with corporations to engaged in wars of opportunity for profit. A closed loop of human destruction that grows like a cancer.

    I think the real solution is just getting the wealthy to dismantle the system. It sounds kind of silly and simple, but they are the only ones with the power to actually change anything at this point in a meaningful way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Absolutely. But the rich will only dismantle the system under threat of violence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    I am not sure I agree with this. Even if the threat of violence is effective I am not sure it is the correct thing to do. I think we can both agree there may be solutions we haven't even thought of yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    It is manifestly not the correct thing to do. Coercing people under threat of violence is an inherently evil act.

    And I fervently hope there is some other solution, but humanity has had many thousands of years to think of one, and none is forthcoming.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 5 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [+] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    I am 50 years old and I left the army 27 years ago and I was never in combat therefore have never murdered anyone and I'm reporting your comment because the horrible things you said to me are most likely bannable offenses in every instance according to every mod.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Go ahead and report me. Even pre-9/11 the US military has had a long history of atrocities and you still chose to serve in it. Even if you didn't directly get your hands dirty you still supported the modern Nazi army and I stand by what I said. I don't give a damn if I get banned for saying it cause it needed to be said.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›
    16 comments in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post