all 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 4 months ago

As usual the headline over promises and under delivers. The program will continue after a review.

It came while morale at the company was at a nadir

At least there’s this. The first step to becoming better people is facing up to the global horrors your work is responsible for.

following fresh layoffs

Oh, never mind.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • 17 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

    “We will only re-enable MCI when we are confident in the effectiveness of our data protection controls,” Stephane Kasriel, a Meta vice president overseeing AI research, told employees Monday, according to Wired. Kasriel said the company discovered and resolved the issue last week, but that the  initial fix didn’t work.

    Temporary pause on the program. It will be back on by next week I bet. Also, at this this point, if you work for meta, it is getting harder and harder to feel bad for you.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Why would you feel bad for anyone working for Meta at this point? They've been the bad guy for well over a decade. There is zero excuse. If you are still working for them you are complicit in evil and you deserve everything that happens to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I get the feeling, but surely there are people who work there without the education or financial cushion to take a risk on leaving.

    What is your position on those people?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    surely there are people who work there without the education or financial cushion to take a risk on leaving

    Meta has always had an elitist, credential-happy hiring process. So no, your education concern seems ill-founded. Financial cushion depends on individual choices and circumstances, so there may be some people in that trap.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    while we have no indication at this time that any data was improperly accessed by Meta employees, we’re pausing it while we investigate

    So why are you pausing it again?

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (10 children)

    So why are you pausing it again?

    we’re pausing it while we investigate

    It's literally right there in your own quote...because they are still investigating this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    And what are they investigating?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (7 children)

    That seems pretty obvious no? Whether or not people that shouldn't have had access to this data have accessed it. Even if they have the data showing whether or not it happened, it still takes time to go through it because they collect insane amounts on their employees.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    WHY WOULD THEY INVESTIGATE SOMETHING THEY HAVE "NO INDICATION" HAPPENED!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    They have no indication at this time, which means that they're not done looking but so far haven't found anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Because the best way to find any such indications is to keep looking for them in all possible places? Yes they should have added "yet." But investigating while attempting to reassure is standard practice in crises

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • 10 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 15 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    we have no indication at this time that any data was improperly accessed by Meta employees

    What does "no indication" mean if they record every keystroke? Did they screw up their snooping program as usual, or are they lying as usual?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago*

    It means they've checked the logs and didn't find anything suspicious at first glance, but just in case they missed something they're covering their asses.

    ...or flat out lying in an attempt to cover it up.

    It could be either, depending on how well they think they can contain this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    Site asks to use cookies and access to private data.

    I wish mods would ban sites like this. What's the point of discussing privacy on a forum with links that violate privacy?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Meta’s controversial program that spied on its employees’ computers has backfired spectacularly.

    Though its chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth assured that the data it collected would be “tightly controlled,” the company is now pausing the tracking program after sensitive employee information was leaked internally, according to reports from Business Insider and Wired.

    A security notice sent out Monday said that the exposed data included employee’s full AI prompts and transcriptions, performance data, and even private conversations. The leak allowed the data to be accessible to any employee inside the company.

    Meta said it’s investigating the incident and confirmed it paused the program, but maintains it’s keeping a lid on things.

    “We have carefully designed this program with privacy safeguards, and while we have no indication at this time that any data was improperly accessed by Meta employees, we’re pausing it while we investigate,” a spokesperson told outlets.

    The program, dubbed the Model Capability Initiative, was intended to gather data so Meta’s AI models could learn “how people actually complete everyday tasks using computers.” Reports suggested it collected everything from employee keystrokes to recording their computer screens.

    When it was announced in April, it immediately sparked backlash in the workforce, with internal posts openly denouncing the initiative as an invasion of privacy, and some employees circulating a petition calling to end it. It came while morale at the company was at a nadir, following fresh layoffs that forced out nearly 8,000 employees, and a heavy push from the top that workers should heavily use AI to produce as much code as possible.

    Under CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s directive, the company has doubled-down even further on developing automation tech, moving employees who were working elsewhere onto a new AI project, sowing further discontent.

    Reactions from employees about the leak were unequivocally critical.

    “I am incensed,” one employee wrote Monday in an internal group, per a screenshot obtained by BI.

    “I don’t see any evidence of malicious access, but the fact that this data wasn’t locked down as originally promised is super frustrating,” another complained.

    Memes also abounded. In an internal forum, one employee posted an image of Jim Halpert from “The Office” holding a sign that says, “0 days since our last nonsense.”

    Bosworth, Meta’s CTO who promised that the collected data would be “tightly controlled,” responded to employees’ posts by admitting that the initiative’s implementation had fallen short of the standards set in its prevacy review, per Wired.

    The company, however, is poised to resume the data tracking program once the issue is settled.

    “We will only re-enable MCI when we are confident in the effectiveness of our data protection controls,” Stephane Kasriel, a Meta vice president overseeing AI research, told employees Monday, according to Wired. Kasriel said the company discovered and resolved the issue last week, but that the initial fix didn’t work.

    It’s not the only recent security blunder at Meta. In March, a rogue AI agent gave an employee advice that it wasn’t authorized to share, resulting in sensitive data being exposed and causing what was described as a critical security incident.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    The company, however, is poised to resume the data tracking program once the issue is settled.

    Yep. Sounds like Meta.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    My company (near the top of the fortune 500 companies) has been doing this for a while. They track every file change, intercept all http web connections using MitM attacks, etc.

    It causes tons of issues for software development and the production application operations including extreme slowdown of both laptops and servers as it thrashes disks and pauses things when the buffers fill up. It can't keep up with applications that use lots of disk caching or make many small file modifications, like merging a large git repo. So things crash and generally run very poorly all the time. Plus all http connections end up with invalid certificates after the MitM attacks, and they block a lot of connections even to places like GitHub which we use. So things break constantly.

    They laid off most technical people with any experience (should say with any moderately higher salaries) as part of their push for AI to take over those jobs. So, most of the people dealing with these issues don't understand the technology.

    I can't imagine what they could use all pf that data for which includes tons of employee and customer private data. It would take years to sort through for some specific breach, so it's useless for it's stated purpose. It's just ripe for hackers to steal tons of data on tens of millions of people around the world, though.

    When executives and middle managers are put on charge of technical decisions utilizing "AI" and short term, junior level technical contractors, it's no wonder they make tons of bad decisions and don't recognize how much it's costing them. If only there was competition to drive innovation rather than easy cost cutting like laying off experienced employees, maybe things would change. But that's impossible in the modern late-stage capitalist economy they've created. So we just have to wait for the whole system to collapse. But by then we may have reached a point where it's no longer possible to prevent extinction from climate change (water and food shortages, pandemics, and all the other things were seeing). We just need to wait and see what collapses first I suppose. If only democracy hadn't been turned into this farce and media hadn't been coopted and consolidated to not allow enough people to see what's really going on, maybe we could change it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    They laid off most technical people with any experience (should say with any moderately higher salaries) as part of their push for AI to take over those jobs

    One my fav quotes from Ricky Gervais applies to management like that.

    “When you are dead, you do not know that you are dead. It is only difficult for the others. It is the same when you are stupid”.

  • source
  • parent
  • 8 comments in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    “We have carefully designed this program with privacy safeguards, and while we have no indication at this time that any data was improperly accessed by Meta employees, we’re pausing it while we investigate,” a spokesperson told outlets.

    "Pwetty pweese, do not make ewows and pwotect the employee infowmation"

    for employee in company:
      copy_information(employee.data, protected_folder)
      compress(protected_folder)
    
  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    gEt OfF oF fAcEbO0K l0SeRs... be brave just say NO... fuck keeping in touch with grandmal. Just don't.... stop now. you fucking yankkkee pig dog narcissist. Fuck big teeeccchhhh

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    all we do is loser shit....

  • source
  • [+] -15 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Funny, but not AI-related.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 41 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The program, dubbed the Model Capability Initiative, was intended to gather data so Meta’s AI models could learn “how people actually complete everyday tasks using computers.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 7 comments in c/artificial_intel@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Seems like a great time to realize you work at one of the worst companies in the world, and leak all that discovered data to the press..

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Man, I know Meta is too big to fail and all that, but this really reads like the company is falling apart...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I’m just imagining the keylogs for meta video editors looking like pages upon pages of

    Lklk⇧cllllkjk⇧cvalk⇧clllllllkjjk⇧cv…

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is the inevitable consequence of the 'cloud-telemetry-first' approach to AI developer tools. If your AI coding assistants or workflow agents are logging your terminal history, active files, or screen activity back to a centralized cloud database for 'orchestration' or 'training,' you have essentially installed corporate spyware. It doesn't matter if it's Meta, Microsoft, or a startup—a single misconfigured pipeline or data breach will expose trade secrets, API keys, and private credentials. AI agents must have hard local boundaries. Tool execution (reading files, executing shell commands, querying local databases) must happen entirely locally under a zero-knowledge architecture, and every single execution must require explicit user-consent dialogs. Sending execution telemetry back to the cloud is a massive security hazard that corporations are only beginning to realize.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 3 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    Seems like a great time to realize you work at one of the worst companies in the world, and leak all that discovered data to the press..

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • 3 comments in c/Aii@programming.dev view that post
    1 comment in c/demeta@programming.dev view that post