For years, Donald Trump has leaned on all-caps social media posts to grab attention online.

His Truth Social feed often reads like a never-ending shouting match. However, that changed after Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.) began mocking the president’s style in dozens of posts interspersed among his regular missives.

This has been going on for the better part of a week, and seems to have gotten to Trump’s ego, as his latest Truth Social posts aren’t in his classic all-caps style.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 1 year ago (9 children)

Go watch the clip. In the context of Jon Stewart it's weird. He hasn't given the idea serious thought since the rally to restore sanity in ancient times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Even Jon Stewart cannot defy the rules of logic.

    Either he explicitly said "I am running for president" or he implied it by saying something other than "I am running for president."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    "I'm not saying I'm running for president but I'm not not saying that, if you know what I mean"

    (haven't seen the clip, just postulating)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    That's not explicit. At most, it strongly implies he's running.

    Pretty much whenever someone ends a sentence with "if you know what I mean", they are implying something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's not explicitly saying X, it's explicitly implying X. Really being explicit that they're implying the thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You can't explicitly imply something. You can either imply or be explicit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Our understanding of how words work is different and that is ok. We've clearly communicated how we each interpret the phrase, so there's no misunderstanding in this case and we are unlikely to encounter the same phrase together again in the wild.

    edit: root disagreement is that you believe the adverb "explicitly" cannot modify the verb "imply", whereas I believe it can. I doubt either of us will convince the other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    "Explicit" is literally defined as "fully revealed or expressed without vagueness, implication"

    Which makes sense, because "explicit" and "implicit" are antonyms. Do you think that something can "explosively implode"?

  • source
  • parent