His argument was literally that

  • artists, writers, and programmers are "labor aristocracy" and deserve no respect because they're sitting around making art and writing code while other people are toiling and laboring,
  • genAI is a "free resource" ("it's free for me to use at work") that "helps everyone make things" instead of having to rely on skill and expertise and therefore makes everything equal,
  • it's hypocritical of people to be worried about the environmental and societal impact of genAI because "only white people are worried about it now that their hobbies are being threatened and everyone else is catching up".

Pointing out there there are artists and programmers from every race and economic class, as well as perfectly ordinary people in every walk of life who are all actively being harmed both by the theft of ideas and labor and by the physical effects of gigantic data centers ruining communities, was met with much hand-waving and incredibly impenetrable philosophical jargon.

I'm particularly incensed because I'm as leftist and anticapitalist as they come and this felt like the fuckery some conservative cockwomble would try to come up with to parody socialism, except this guy was completely serious.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 15 points 2 days ago (16 children)

This is like saying we don't need to pay a minimum wage nowย because under communism each will be provided according to their needs.ย 

IP is a necessary evil under the current system to stop distributors like Instagram, tiktok,ย  or AI companies from taking labor from workers (artists, writers, etc.) without compensation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

    That is true..... but it's important to remember, I think, that even under a non-capitalist system, people are still going to care about plagiarism and attribution. Recognizing where an idea came from is a basic sign of respect for the effort that goes into creating them, you know?

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 3 points 1 day ago

    It's also saying that artists' works shouldn't be considered personal property. Even as an anarchist, I wouldn't want people taking my drawings and using them however they wanted without my blessing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 5 points 1 day ago (13 children)

    IP is a necessary evil under the current system to stop distributors like Instagram, tiktok, or AI companies from taking labor from workers (artists, writers, etc.) without compensation.

    Seemingly this did not work.

    Almost like rules dont apply for the ruling class and the whole IP spiel is just, as pointed out, completely and utterly capitalist.

    And to think that IP laws would prevent the rich from thieving is hilariously naive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [โ€“] 2 points 1 day ago (12 children)

    You're not really a communist if you don't think the rich can ever be brought to heel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 day ago (11 children)

    Of course they can be brought to heel. But not really with laws of the bourgeois state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 day ago (10 children)

    Then you bring them to heel to respect IP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    They dont even pay taxes. IP is FOR THEM and is used against US.

    They can only be forced to adhere to laws by constant fear of execution otherwise they "invent" a legal loophole.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 day ago (8 children)
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 day ago* (7 children)

    Like Luigi?

    You see what they do to him?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 1 day ago (6 children)

    No, not like Luigi, you doofus.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 14 hours ago (5 children)
  • [โ€“] 1 point 13 hours ago (4 children)

    Luigi was one guy, Absender.
    Ideally, you would get a second~ guy~ to help you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 12 hours ago (3 children)

    That is maybe something Luigi thought about as well, but that is not how the world works

    The world works for the rich and we are the world. Not the rich.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 11 hours ago (2 children)

    but that is not how the world works

    ^ This is what I mean, you're not a communist. You don't believe in collective power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 1 point 10 hours ago (1 child)

    I am too old for this kind of Gate keeping and to let some Internet rando dictate what is communist or not

    Especially when we saw within our Life Time the assassination of a billionaire and experienced for ourselves that the "Power of Friendship" i mean 'collective power' did not, surprisingly, magically appear.

    I am a realist, materialist and communist.

    Not some fanatic that chases fairy tales.

    If you think gunning down solo a billionaire would magically incite a Revolution Go for it.

    Everyone of these things less is a net benefit for humanity, but i have too much to lose to be the Assassin in an empiracilly proven almost fruitless endevour.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)