Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has accused establishment Democrats of treating her “like shit” as progressive activists urged her to run for president in 2028.

In a 100-minute long video posted on Instagram, the 37-year-old congresswoman from New York said that the party had a “remarkable opportunity” to pass left-wing policies after the midterm elections. She also accused the party’s leadership of starving funds from left-wing candidates during the campaign.

“There’s this huge conversation about candidates that were under invested in,” Ocasio-Cortez said. She cited Angie Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America who came within 240,000 votes of flipping Florida from red to blue, but ultimately lost to the Republican candidate Ashley Moody.

“If Angie Nixon had just had a little bit of that support, that outcome could have changed. But that money has to come from somewhere and it comes from these people,” Ocasio-Cortez said in reference to the party’s Senate leadership.

Reflecting on the period after she was first elected to Congress in 2018 at the age of 29, Ocasio-Cortez accused senior Democrats of being “horrifically cruel” to her. “I mean I was treated like shit,” she said. “Everybody took a swing at me.”

The Bronx congresswoman is seen as the likeliest progressive candidate to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -7 points 1 day ago (19 children)

America is far too sexist to elect a female president.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Do you think America is uniquely sexist? Is the USA more sexist than Mexico, South Korea, India, or any other place that elected women leaders?

    There is no doubt that sexism is an obstacle to overcome, but I do not think it is an insurmountable one. Sure, being a woman was a roadblock for Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, but their gender was not a significant reason why those neoliberal candidates lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

    Joe Biden won and he was just as terrible a candidate, hell in some respects he was WORSE "Nothing will fundamentally change"

    The only difference was gender.

    America is uniquely sexist, they think the presence of anything that seems even remotely feminine is woke and evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 16 hours ago

    Biden 2020 ran on a change campaign. Trump's COVID policies had just killed a million people and his admin was causing chaos. Biden promised to reverse that chaos and barely won because he promised nothing new, only a return to regular governance. If he ran a more progressive platform, he likely would have won by a bigger margin.

    Harris 2024 ran a very different campaign. She promised that nothing would change from the Biden presidency while people were very unhappy with Biden's policies. Trump 2024 ran a change campaign where he promised to improve the economy and stop foreign wars. If Harris ran a more progressive platform, she likely would have won.

    There were very significant differences between the Biden 2020 campaign and the Harris 2024 campaign. Running on marginal changes won a marginal victory. Running on no changes became a loss.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    I think that's the easy way out here. I think America rejected corporate-backed Democrats. AOC is not like Harris or Clinton and it's a shame that only her gender is being held up here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    Yeah, but the alternative was Trump. Trump was chosen over a woman, TWICE, when Trump lost he was against a man who was just as corporate-backed as the women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I don't think it came down to people voting for a man over a woman across the board. This is a really myopic view of the situation when it's much, much more complicated than that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    People who cry sexism about everything are incapable of nuance, literally everything is understood and filtered through that single lens. It's so lazy, no further reasoning required, and if you argue the point, well then you're sexist too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (2 children)

    Where are you drawing this conclusion from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Our persistent and prevalent rape culture probably. There is a lot of sexism in the US. It was certainly a factor, it just wasn't the only one. I also believe that we are absolutely capable of electing a woman to the presidency.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    I convinced my mom to vote for a woman and you can too, you just suck

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments