Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has accused establishment Democrats of treating her “like shit” as progressive activists urged her to run for president in 2028.

In a 100-minute long video posted on Instagram, the 37-year-old congresswoman from New York said that the party had a “remarkable opportunity” to pass left-wing policies after the midterm elections. She also accused the party’s leadership of starving funds from left-wing candidates during the campaign.

“There’s this huge conversation about candidates that were under invested in,” Ocasio-Cortez said. She cited Angie Nixon, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America who came within 240,000 votes of flipping Florida from red to blue, but ultimately lost to the Republican candidate Ashley Moody.

“If Angie Nixon had just had a little bit of that support, that outcome could have changed. But that money has to come from somewhere and it comes from these people,” Ocasio-Cortez said in reference to the party’s Senate leadership.

Reflecting on the period after she was first elected to Congress in 2018 at the age of 29, Ocasio-Cortez accused senior Democrats of being “horrifically cruel” to her. “I mean I was treated like shit,” she said. “Everybody took a swing at me.”

The Bronx congresswoman is seen as the likeliest progressive candidate to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 2028.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

Joe Biden won and he was just as terrible a candidate, hell in some respects he was WORSE "Nothing will fundamentally change"

The only difference was gender.

America is uniquely sexist, they think the presence of anything that seems even remotely feminine is woke and evil.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 17 hours ago

    Biden 2020 ran on a change campaign. Trump's COVID policies had just killed a million people and his admin was causing chaos. Biden promised to reverse that chaos and barely won because he promised nothing new, only a return to regular governance. If he ran a more progressive platform, he likely would have won by a bigger margin.

    Harris 2024 ran a very different campaign. She promised that nothing would change from the Biden presidency while people were very unhappy with Biden's policies. Trump 2024 ran a change campaign where he promised to improve the economy and stop foreign wars. If Harris ran a more progressive platform, she likely would have won.

    There were very significant differences between the Biden 2020 campaign and the Harris 2024 campaign. Running on marginal changes won a marginal victory. Running on no changes became a loss.

  • source
  • parent