▲ 18 ▼ UK Sex Workers Wake Up to Sites Purging Their Content Following UK Porn Ban (www.404media.co) submitted 13 hours ago by blkvvvs@lemmy.zip to c/fauxmoi@sh.itjust.works 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments Insane content censorship destroying people’s ability to make a living. Great one, UK.
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 12 hours ago (15 children) Unmarked sarcasm detected. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (14 children) Not sarcasm. That’s terrible that the work they thought would abide by the new laws is being taken down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -3 points 12 hours ago (13 children) Your comment was... vague, to say the least. It's the kind of comment someone who wants to say more things that they know most would disagree with would leave. It felt like bait by a troll. As such, I'd suggest trying to make your intended meaning more clear going forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago Why do you think people should adjust how they type to cater to your sensibilities? Instead of vice versa? permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (11 children) Just because you read sarcasm where there was none doesn’t mean I need to adjust my comments. Rude. I clarified that I was not being sarcastic. I was being honest. It’s terrible that the government is taking down their work and making it more difficult for them to make a living. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago* (10 children) What's "rude" is being dismissive of constructive criticism offered in good faith. I did not attack your personally, but merely pointed out how easily your vague comment could be misinterpreted & suggested trying to avoid that in the future. But, then I guess I should have known better - this being the Internet & all. Good day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (8 children) What's also rude is doubling down on wanting to call others "bottoms' in derogatory manners and claiming it's not homophobic. You were nitpicking at me for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago (7 children) WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago Why the fuck do you keep digging this hole buddy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 7 points 12 hours ago (14 children) Not sarcasm. That’s terrible that the work they thought would abide by the new laws is being taken down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -3 points 12 hours ago (13 children) Your comment was... vague, to say the least. It's the kind of comment someone who wants to say more things that they know most would disagree with would leave. It felt like bait by a troll. As such, I'd suggest trying to make your intended meaning more clear going forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago Why do you think people should adjust how they type to cater to your sensibilities? Instead of vice versa? permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (11 children) Just because you read sarcasm where there was none doesn’t mean I need to adjust my comments. Rude. I clarified that I was not being sarcastic. I was being honest. It’s terrible that the government is taking down their work and making it more difficult for them to make a living. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago* (10 children) What's "rude" is being dismissive of constructive criticism offered in good faith. I did not attack your personally, but merely pointed out how easily your vague comment could be misinterpreted & suggested trying to avoid that in the future. But, then I guess I should have known better - this being the Internet & all. Good day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (8 children) What's also rude is doubling down on wanting to call others "bottoms' in derogatory manners and claiming it's not homophobic. You were nitpicking at me for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago (7 children) WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago Why the fuck do you keep digging this hole buddy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -3 points 12 hours ago (13 children) Your comment was... vague, to say the least. It's the kind of comment someone who wants to say more things that they know most would disagree with would leave. It felt like bait by a troll. As such, I'd suggest trying to make your intended meaning more clear going forward. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 13 child comments replies: [–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago Why do you think people should adjust how they type to cater to your sensibilities? Instead of vice versa? permalink fedilink source parent [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (11 children) Just because you read sarcasm where there was none doesn’t mean I need to adjust my comments. Rude. I clarified that I was not being sarcastic. I was being honest. It’s terrible that the government is taking down their work and making it more difficult for them to make a living. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago* (10 children) What's "rude" is being dismissive of constructive criticism offered in good faith. I did not attack your personally, but merely pointed out how easily your vague comment could be misinterpreted & suggested trying to avoid that in the future. But, then I guess I should have known better - this being the Internet & all. Good day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (8 children) What's also rude is doubling down on wanting to call others "bottoms' in derogatory manners and claiming it's not homophobic. You were nitpicking at me for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago (7 children) WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago Why the fuck do you keep digging this hole buddy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago Why do you think people should adjust how they type to cater to your sensibilities? Instead of vice versa? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 12 hours ago (11 children) Just because you read sarcasm where there was none doesn’t mean I need to adjust my comments. Rude. I clarified that I was not being sarcastic. I was being honest. It’s terrible that the government is taking down their work and making it more difficult for them to make a living. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago* (10 children) What's "rude" is being dismissive of constructive criticism offered in good faith. I did not attack your personally, but merely pointed out how easily your vague comment could be misinterpreted & suggested trying to avoid that in the future. But, then I guess I should have known better - this being the Internet & all. Good day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (8 children) What's also rude is doubling down on wanting to call others "bottoms' in derogatory manners and claiming it's not homophobic. You were nitpicking at me for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago (7 children) WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago Why the fuck do you keep digging this hole buddy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago* (10 children) What's "rude" is being dismissive of constructive criticism offered in good faith. I did not attack your personally, but merely pointed out how easily your vague comment could be misinterpreted & suggested trying to avoid that in the future. But, then I guess I should have known better - this being the Internet & all. Good day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (8 children) What's also rude is doubling down on wanting to call others "bottoms' in derogatory manners and claiming it's not homophobic. You were nitpicking at me for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago (7 children) WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent [–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago Why the fuck do you keep digging this hole buddy? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (8 children) What's also rude is doubling down on wanting to call others "bottoms' in derogatory manners and claiming it's not homophobic. You were nitpicking at me for a reason. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago (7 children) WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -4 points 11 hours ago (7 children) WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago* (6 children) I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (5 children) I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username. I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago (4 children) Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure. It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -5 points 11 hours ago (3 children) You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable"). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (2 children) You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today -2 points 10 hours ago* (1 child) I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day." Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me. Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago Why the fuck do you keep digging this hole buddy? permalink fedilink source parent