16
UK Sex Workers Wake Up to Sites Purging Their Content Following UK Porn Ban (www.404media.co)
submitted 3 days ago by to c/fauxmoi@sh.itjust.works
19 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Insane content censorship destroying people’s ability to make a living. Great one, UK.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 days ago (14 children)

Not sarcasm. That’s terrible that the work they thought would abide by the new laws is being taken down.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago (13 children)

    Your comment was... vague, to say the least. It's the kind of comment someone who wants to say more things that they know most would disagree with would leave. It felt like bait by a troll.

    As such, I'd suggest trying to make your intended meaning more clear going forward.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (11 children)

    Just because you read sarcasm where there was none doesn’t mean I need to adjust my comments. Rude.

    I clarified that I was not being sarcastic.

    I was being honest. It’s terrible that the government is taking down their work and making it more difficult for them to make a living.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 3 days ago* (10 children)

    What's "rude" is being dismissive of constructive criticism offered in good faith. I did not attack your personally, but merely pointed out how easily your vague comment could be misinterpreted & suggested trying to avoid that in the future.

    But, then I guess I should have known better - this being the Internet & all. Good day.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago (8 children)

    What's also rude is doubling down on wanting to call others "bottoms' in derogatory manners and claiming it's not homophobic.

    You were nitpicking at me for a reason.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 days ago (7 children)

    WTF are you on about? This complete non-sequitur is an utterly bizarre accusation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 days ago* (6 children)

    I'm aware that there's currently a witch hunt directed at me going on and I remember your username from the other day.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 3 days ago (5 children)

    I'm unaware of such, and would not participate in such. Your paranoia is drawing in innocent victims, apparently. I'm sorry you're going through that, but that doesn't justify you leaping to baseless accusations just because you remember my username.

    I'll grant we've had disagreements before due to similar reactions on your part, but I always try to be respectful of others when they've done nothing wrong, and I try to treat each interaction as a new opportunity to communicate & understand one another. From previous interactions, I'd expect that to be an attitude you'd appreciate.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (4 children)

    Scolding me for not writing comments the way you prefer is respectful? Sure.

    It's not paranoia when I am receiving said messages and comments, but thanks for trying to paint me as unreliable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

    You painted yourself. All I did was demonstrate how your overly vague comment could be misinterpreted. You're the one taking this to absurd levels & accusations. Seems like a pretty reasonable interpretation to consider it a bit over the top paranoia (and - in your wording - "painting {yourself} as unreliable").

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

    You assumed I was being sarcastic and when you got called out for it, you blamed me for how I write my comments.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 days ago* (1 child)

    I suppose that's one interpretation. Another is what I've already said. Since you're supposedly under some sort of "attack" (something I must note I now find questionable considering the excessive paranoia you've demonstrated over this simple misunderstanding), I'd normally write this absurd argument off as just "someone having a bad day."

    Seeing as how we've had this type of discussion before, however, I think your unwillingness to look at your own errors in judgment - such as your ridiculous accusation - in a fair manner speaks for itself. You haven't even apologized for lobbing such an explosive accusation, yet continue to attack me & try to pin blame on me.

    Considering all this, I'm done wasting my time here. Goodbye.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 days ago

    There's literally an active post in an asklemmy community that is targeting me solely, but yeah. I'm paranoid /s

    Considering all this, I’m done wasting my time here. Goodbye.

    Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent