Can't escape AI slop projects from meat proxies man. Every single open source project smells like Claude Code recently. Sad times.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 day ago (28 children)
  • [–] [S] 15 points 1 day ago (27 children)
  • [–] -5 points 1 day ago (13 children)

    Why can't you just accept that some people feel that they benefit from using AI?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] [S] 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Billionaires probably also feel like they benefit from contributing to environmental damage and societal collapse like you prompstitutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    Societal collapse is inevitable with or without AI if we let capitalism continue. Also do you know how much AI actually contributes to global warming? There are so many things you could be doing such as not eating meat, not owning a car or using a smaller car and driving it less, organising against capitalism before you consider lecturing people on their AI usage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

    why can't you just accept that some people feel that they benefit from using meth?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

    the anti-ai crowd is a cult. youre not going to logic them out of something their emotions are controlling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 23 hours ago (11 children)

    Imagine having to look into someone's account for argument material. Sorry for you man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 23 hours ago (10 children)

    Swing and a miss.

    Checking post history to see who I'm talking to is called due diligence, champ. You have sadder shit in your profile that I did you the courtesy of not quoting because it's not relevant to the topic at hand.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 23 hours ago (9 children)

    Man just stop. You are embarrassing yourself even more by trying to act all tough. "Champ" yeah right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (8 children)

    Still no argument, dough.

    Play the game not the man, champ.

    TTFN!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 23 hours ago (7 children)

    I feel like you're the bottom half of that shitty meme you posted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 23 hours ago* (6 children)

    Bold of you to call me a clown from inside the circus. Also, I didn't post the meme.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

    No idea what you mean by that. And yes, you did post a meme https://lemmy.ml/post/54966051/28807351

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

    On this end, you responded to an upstream post - federation does weird things to comment threading.

    As for the 2nd meme: I posted it. I’m Gus. You just accidentally complimented my methodology and insulted yourself. Do you need me to type more s-l-o-w-l-y?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 20 hours ago (1 child)

    Friend, you're clearly getting tilted. Every single reply has a highschool tier dig tagged on for no reason.

    You know you can have actual discussions with people in these threads, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

    Tilted? Hell no, I'm having a blast :)

    But serious discussion about AI - on Lemmy? The famously fair and even-handed Lemmy? Where a single thread had people calling others morons, bots and accusing them of being anally puppeteered by Claude Code for having the temerity to disagree?

    Nah.

    We tried the substantive debate downstream.

  • source
  • parent