you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 17 points 4 days ago (18 children)

I did a google search. Then followed it up with Kagi until I ran out of scroll.

Every headline minus a couple fringe items, repeats that Jeffries will be the next speaker.

Almost all of them.

We are so fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 days ago (6 children)

    Not saying that is not a foregone conclusion but your method is flawed here.

    Every search and headline today would be parroting what he said yesterday. There literally has not been any time for anyone to say differently in public (even if asked, most would not voice an opinion on election day)

    If I search today, like you did, looking for the orange pedophile's response to the midterm election, it would seem he will respect it and allow the transfer of power... however, he may change his syphilitic mind and throw another insurrection tomorrow

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

    There has been time. There’s one UK opinion piece on infighting between Dems.

    There’s one Indian news site that brought up the change.org petition to not have Jeffries.

    There’s an ex Bernie campaigner site that has a “Progress stops with Jeffries” headline.

    That’s it. But if they’ve had time, everyone has had time. They’re choosing to rally behind Jeffries. But that’s corporate media working their damnedest after the fact, because he’s their dam on the tsunami. So, full headline support.

    Change.org is typically a point of interest. Note how the 450k signatures overnight are ignored by American media.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago*

    New republic is a fringe publication only Redditors (and their Lemmy defectors) read.

    This is one of the main points of news that hold info the middle of the bell curve block of the public do not consume.

    Meaning, for the purposes we are discussing now, it may as well not exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

    That’s it. But if they’ve had time, everyone has had time.

    You mean the 3 examples you found from people either not in the USA at all or one standalone campaigner? yes, how is it that the people running for a historic election are not already working and posting publicly about this specific thing?!

    Change.org is typically a point of interest. Note how the 450k signatures overnight are ignored by American media.

    The petition has 49K not 450K; but I think it's typical to be ignored because I can sign it and I am Canadian... there is almost no legitimacy to these online petitions

    PS: turns out there are, at least 2, petitions against Jeffries.

    The one you point out with 450K signatures is 2 months old (so not overnight)

    The one I found, is from yesterday, and has 49K so far

    May I suggest that, if you are posting some backing evidence, post directly to it, not to an open repository

    https://www.change.org/p/house-democrats-choose-a-new-speaker

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 days ago* (2 children)

    There was a good video put out by AOC last night about how the speaker is voted for, based on that I think the answer is finding out who the caucus leaders are and getting their attention, because the voting basically comes down to all of the cliques of Congress/Senate getting together to decide who is speaker/Majority Leader, so we need to get in the ear of the leaders of those political cliques within the Democratic party, because based on AOCs responses, the cliques have the power and the smaller cliques and independents are on the outside looking in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • They have such a commanding majority that they could leave 40+ members out. If the progressives have any guts they would hold their vote hostage to reconsider other choices. It would look pretty bad if there was a wave and then a fresh speaker battle so it might motivate them to reconsider.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (4 children)

    I've seen a few headlines of congresspeople and congresspeople-elects saying basically that they want to exercise caution and hold some more discussions about who to nominate for the leadership roles.

    It's basically a diplomatic way of saying they'd rather support someone else. Just need to build some consensus on who.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 days ago* (3 children)

    AOC. I’m old and I don’t follow her religiously or anything, but everything I’ve seen is a positive. She’s not as charismatic as some, but that’s ok.

    I like her CSPAN footage. CSPAN. Like I said, I’m old.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 days ago*

    I also like AOC a lot. I'd be super happy to see her as Madam Speaker, if enough House Dems can get behind her.

    I think she has her own kind of charisma, but she seems to self-censor sometimes because earlier in her career she was targeted with a lot of republican hate. She was one of the first progressives to break ground in Congress. She's a strong, independent Latina woman. In short, she's everything republicans fear.

    So there was a lot of red scare BS thrown at her, not to mention the tons of misogyny that tends to follow any woman who's successful in politics. She's also had to make waves even in her own party just to be heard. Some centrist Dems viewed her as disruptive. So she doesn't seem as outspoken on the House floor as she once was, which I view as a strategic conservation of energy. She still does a lot of great work on her committees, and that's probably where you've seen her shine on CSPAN (a great resource, more people should watch it).

    She also does a lot of legwork behind the scenes reviewing policy, organizing the progressive momentum, listening to her constituents, and actually fighting for their needs. She still has a lot of energy, but she directs it where it's appreciated now. Progressive rallies, reaching out to the younger generation of voters on social media, educating anyone who will listen, etc.

    In short I think she's a really great politician, and a great person in general. We might need a few more electoral cycles before we have enough progressive Dems in the House to support her for Speakership though. And by then I hope she primaries Schumer anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago (1 child)

    She’s not as charismatic as some

    She isn't? Compared to who?

    Also, it doesn't hurt that not only does she back the right policies and is smart and eloquent AF, but she's a freaking smoke show. I'm not sure I've ever seen a more attractive woman in Congress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 days ago

    I love that she looks feminine. This idea that we are a supposed to tone it down and wear grey and have the most boring hair possible to be “professional” is bullshit.

    Honestly, if Fetterman can show up looking like it’s laundry day, why can’t women show up in more feminine gear, if they choose?

    Red lipstick, hoop earrings, and that chic white suit are a start. I dream of a future where our female politicians can roll in glittering like Avasarala and not get any shit for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    Maybe it's time for the Democrats to go through the equivalent of whatever internal civil war process put Mike Johnson in the chair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 child)

    They would sooner exile every progressive than let that happen, just look at the lack of alarm bells when one of the progressives is being unlawfully investigated for deportation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 days ago

    "They" lost a lot of seats to the progressives, too. All these new representatives join forces with the returning progressives, and the corporate establishment won't look quite so inevitable.

  • source
  • parent