Tribunal vice-chair Eric Regehr said in the latest decision that he was reversing the fine, and that X had a valid defence under a section of the intimate images law that states an internet company is not liable if it "has taken reasonable steps to address the unlawful distribution."

What a motherfucker

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 5 days ago

Bullshit of the highest order. The image is of a BC resident, BC law should apply. Fuck Musk

  • source