you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I don't agree with the "especially veterans" part of the no one should be homeless. Veteran status, in itself, does not make one more worthy of a basic necessity of life. What I will agree with is that the government has a responsibility to make sure everyone is house especially veterans. The government owes them more than others for serving them. The universe does not.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    It's a key point to engage the moderates and the right, but fighting it risks sliding down the "all lives matter" slope.

    The government hired them and fucked them up; the government owes them support. We (royal we) 'let' the government get to this point, even if it's not specifically you and I. Our taxes going to that end is far from a travesty. Let's cut back a little on defense and use the savings to prop up the guys that got fucked up on it's behalf.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago* (1 child)

    I don't disagree with any of that. But if you're framing the homelessness problem as a veteran homelessness problem then the applied solutions will likely leave non-veterans that still need help without. All homelessness is a problem. That is not the same as "all lives matter" because homelessness isn't primarily a problem that veterans face. They're estimated to make up 5 percent of the homeless population.

    The government does have a particular responsibility to vets, and should be fixing that. But they have a responsibility to non-vets too. And the things that cause homelessness for veterans causes it for everyone else too. We can and should be helping veterans by addressing the root causes that effect everyone. But any solution that only results in helping vets (like supplying only veterans housing) when they could be helping everyone is unacceptable, particularly as plenty of people would consider the job done so long as the homeless that remain aren't vets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago

    You mistook my answering the veteran part only as framing, no, we can easily afford to house anyone that is willing to be housed. (some homeless will refuse help/treatment even if they need it)

  • source
  • parent