7
I built Levyra, a free and open-source music player for Android and Windows (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 month ago by to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -3 points 1 month ago (9 children)

You're welcome to point out specific issues in the code. The project is open source, so anyone can review it. But calling the code bad without explaining what's wrong doesn't really help anyone. If you've found actual problems, feel free to share them. I'm always willing to improve my app based on constructive feedback

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    The problem is it is slop-coded. Everyone deserves to know that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] -2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    You've said the code is bad several times now, but you still haven't pointed out a single actual problem. If you've found something wrong, show me where and I'll gladly look into it. Otherwise, you're just repeating the same claim without anything to back it up. I have no problem with criticism, but it should at least be based on something concrete. I don't think there's much more to discuss here

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    I've pointed out the actual problem several times now. You're advertising a slop-coded project without disclosure.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago*

    i think they might not know you equate slop with ai, and while i agree ai is a sloppy way to produce sloppy things, expecting others to know this as a face value equivalancy is a human made sloppy idea, inspired by ai.

    edit: an face -> a face

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Repeating that the code is bad isn't the same as showing what's wrong with it. I've already said I'm happy to look into any specific issues you find. You're free to say whatever you want, of course, but without anything concrete to discuss, there's no point in going back and forth. I'm ending the conversation here

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    You keep repeating that I said "the code is bad". That's not what I said. I said it's slop-coded, which says the code is bad, and is also an explanation of why. It's like saying "it's a poop sandwich". I don't have to explicitly say that it's bad, or explain why, that information is obvious from the title. It's poop.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •