Economy and politics are intrinsically tied to one another, no matter how much some economy masters try to say otherwise. Regulations, tariffs and taxes happen because of political pressure and they all have a very direct and measurable effect on the economy. Democracies may not directly control economies like dictatorships can, but they can and do heavily influence it to work one way or another, via tax or tax breaks, easier or harder credit, etc. Culture also plays an important role, even if the majority of economy academics downplay or ignore it, just like they downplay or ignore the importance of nature, but that's a different discussion.

it was founded as a Marxist state

Alright, can you tell me what are some of the marxist teachings that NK applies to how it runs the state and the economy? Because "being founded as" and "actually run as" are not the same. I mean, it's official name is "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". It's obviously not democratic and barely qualifies as a republic

confusing authoritarianism/liberalism with left/right ideologies

I'm not. Left wing ideology usually leans towards "the govt and economy should work for the good of the people". Communism, which is as "far left" as it typically goes, assumes that the people collectively own all the means of production and government becomes unnecessary. Which leads to the next point

It has public ownership

NK doesn't have "public" ownership, as in, the people cannot say that they collectively own anything, and literally have no say in how anything works, everything belongs to and is run according to the will of the state (or, more accurately, the current leader). Like I said before, not different from an absolutist monarchy. Unless you can argue that the majority of Kim's policies are all for the good of the NK people, he cannot be considered "left".

Funny how you mentioned Spain and Portugal but avoided Italy.

What, you gonna tell me that Mussolini was a far left politician?

I expected that anyone who is actually following the discussion would understand that when we are talking about left and right we are talking about left and right in the year 2025 and not in the year 1958, and that we are talking about left and right in the west and not left and right in China or in countries that haven't existed in 30+ years.

Man, these guys really just hated being associated with Stalin and Mao so much that they're not picking up what you're putting down. You're correct, left wing movements can absolutely be led by authoritarians with a cult of personality. That said, I think most leftists view authoritarianism as something so abhorrent that they don't associate those leaders with actual leftist policies.

It's clearly not calibrated Trump. Because I've never seen anyone make a golden idol to Bernie Sanders. Obama hats and flags aren't flying all over my neighborhood. Nobody bases their entire persona around Cortez. So if you're calibrated to Trump your comparison is ridiculous.

I know the chart you’re referring to, but we’re speaking in the context of US politics here. The wave function has collapsed to “right” = authoritarian and “left” = liberal. So, your original assertion presents the false equivalence that has allowed us to get to this current state.

The Roosevelts are widely applauded by the US left, but they don't really worship them, and many are ready to admit they are flawed. Teddy was an imperialist despite being progressive for the time. FDR was an improvement but the Japanese internment camp was a stain in his legacy.

The communists would be more into cult of personality, but most American left are not communists and rightfully reject them.

Democratic voters don't change their opinions based on who is doing the thing

Oh, Democrats still do support hypocrisy. Just to a lesser extent.

E.g. Democratic voters are against insider trading, except when Nancy Pelosi does it. (For balance, insider knowledge about tariffs was 10x more profitable)

The current worshiped charismatic dictator is on the right, but there is absolutely no reason they couldn't also emerge from the left with similar support.

E.g. Biden created the Patriot Act and it doesn't get more authoritarian than that.

I'm not supporting "The Right" I'm saying what happened could equally happen on the left.