▲ 291 ▼ OpenAI hit with landmark lawsuit following Hugging Face hack (www.axios.com) submitted 1 month ago by Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (8 children) AI is a tool Similarly you can't blame a hammer for causing harm, you blame the individual who holds it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Polyphilic@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (1 child) AI is closer to owning a pet. If your dog escapes the back yard and kills a child, you dont blame the dog. You blame the owner who created a poor containment and for giving the dog the right incentives that led to the death permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago I like your analogy and think it fits better for sure. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Therefore, you blame the person wielding the hammer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Yup that's what I was getting at, but I like the pet analogy better that another commenter brought up. permalink fedilink source parent [–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) If you crush someone's skull with a hammer, you are responsible, not the person who made the hammer. But what if you crush someone's skull with a hammer that was sold to you as a head massager? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) In this case open AI was the one wielding the hammer (the AI) though, idk what your argument even is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] visnae@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago But how can you massage yourself without the gun hammer? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sewerking@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago Sort of. With something as simple as a hammer sure, but when the hammer is equipped with a 9mm pistol then it falls under different safety standards that deem the tool inherently unsafe. A physical tool would be recalled if somebody got hurt in an unintended way. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Polyphilic@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (1 child) AI is closer to owning a pet. If your dog escapes the back yard and kills a child, you dont blame the dog. You blame the owner who created a poor containment and for giving the dog the right incentives that led to the death permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago I like your analogy and think it fits better for sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago I like your analogy and think it fits better for sure. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Therefore, you blame the person wielding the hammer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Yup that's what I was getting at, but I like the pet analogy better that another commenter brought up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Yup that's what I was getting at, but I like the pet analogy better that another commenter brought up. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CovertOperative@piefed.zip 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) If you crush someone's skull with a hammer, you are responsible, not the person who made the hammer. But what if you crush someone's skull with a hammer that was sold to you as a head massager? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) In this case open AI was the one wielding the hammer (the AI) though, idk what your argument even is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] visnae@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago But how can you massage yourself without the gun hammer? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago* (1 child) In this case open AI was the one wielding the hammer (the AI) though, idk what your argument even is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] visnae@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago But how can you massage yourself without the gun hammer? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] visnae@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago But how can you massage yourself without the gun hammer? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sewerking@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago Sort of. With something as simple as a hammer sure, but when the hammer is equipped with a 9mm pistol then it falls under different safety standards that deem the tool inherently unsafe. A physical tool would be recalled if somebody got hurt in an unintended way. permalink fedilink source parent