you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 37 points 1 month ago (19 children)

Criticism is not evaluated by where it comes from, but by whether it's true or false. If you don't put truth first, you don't get to have a say in anything anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    MAGA criticizes the Dems for being too far left. I criticize the Dems for being too far right.

    We are not the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    The source does matter. I won't support a MAGAt just because they bash the Dems.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    Then that makes you just another tribalist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    what kinda idiot lets themselves be concern trolled in 2026

    like a good argument is valid regardless of source but republicans and their cognitive dissonance, double standards and general bad faith arguments means sitting through their bullshit in hopes of one is just silly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Sure but that's not the point. If someone gives good criticism, that criticism is good.

    If you don't believe that, you're a tribalist.

    The world gets better when everyone acknowledges and fixes their problems when they're pointed out. It doesn't matter at all whether it's a good person or a bad person that points them out, what a gift it is for someone to show you your flaws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Nope, I just don't accept criticism (or anything else really) from people who can't even form a coherent thought and are just regurgitating sound snippets from pundits...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The issue is the amount of bad faith critique levelled by people on the right. Supporting one of their valid criticisms without mentioning that they are normally full of shit appears like a blanket endorsement even though they may bring up only a single good point it’ll be seen as complete support.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Ya sure but that isn't really what your comment was saying which was more along the lines of "ignore all criticism until you know where it came from".

    Anyways, if the criticism is valid, you are just plugging your ears at that point.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (2 children)

    Motivation and context matters because if you don't pay attention to them you risk ending up an accessory to some asshole's motte-and-bailey fallacy in progress.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 1 month ago

    Humans evaluate facts by the source. People trust their in-group. Someone is far more likely to listen to someone they trust and perceive as in-group than someone who's out-group, regardless of the facts.

    Sometimes this makes sense. If a guy in a nazi uniform told me the bar down the street is a great time, I'm probably not going to go there.

  • source
  • parent