you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 51 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    So what's your solution? Pouting in the corner and saying "I'm not playing"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I mean, the DSA is doing a half way decent job of that in at least a few electorates...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah... Reading your other comments, I think you actually have a decent take on this, but I think the way you're communicating it isn't working for the audience..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    What's the point of communicating if you know that you're being misunderstood?

    It's not about reading comprehension, it's about frame coherence. Other people don't have your particular history of experiences, so some things that make obvious sense to you need more context for other people (the same is true in reverse, obviously).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I'm just curious if you're getting involved in grassroots activism, promoting candidates you agree with, canvassing the neighborhood to try to drum up support, etc. Because these are the sorts of things that need to happen in order to produce a candidate you agree with. It's completely disienguous to put the entire onus of finding a candidate you agree with on other people.

    I want you to vote. I care less about who you vote for than I do you voting at all. Exercising your civic right to choose your representation is a big deal, and I encourage you to stop getting mad at other people for not doing your own legwork, and instead get out there and promote a candidate you agree with. Hell, maybe you should run yourself. I don't know, but I do know that sitting around getting mad because you don't like the major candidates without doing anything about it gets us all nowhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Oh so now someone has to promote candidates they agree with in order to be involved in grassroots organizing

    this is an anarchist space

    Why is it so hard for people to get that the problem is the system, that by promoting any candidate for any role is promoting the system itself? There will never be a candidate I agree with because the people who are empowered by the American constitution to dissolve the union aren't elected officials.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    "I tried nothing and it didn't work" isn't a strategy that works for me.

    I'm not going to sit on my butt and complain into the void. I will do everything I can to get to where I want the world to where I hope it can go.

    Organizing is not in conflict with anarchism.

    Pretending the system doesn't exist or that not participating in any way will change it is a fool's errand.

    Feel free to find another way to participate, but trying to push others to not do what they can, to me, is (at best) an effort to continue the downward trend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This is absurd. Electoral organizing isn't the only kind of organizing. Organizing outside of electoral campaigns is not doing nothing. Telling people the only way to organize or do anything to influence politics is through election campaigns is absolutely in conflict with anarchism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    I'm mad that you chuckle fucks keep riding the vote harder while continuing to give your support to candidates neither of us, allegedly, want instead of letting those candidates just lose because they literally suck.

    What would that accomplish? Sincerely, no one has been able to explain to me how the slightly-less-bad candidate losing provides any benefit whatsoever.

    It's not like the other mainstream candidate doesn't also suck, and moreso in fact.

    It's not like if enough people sit out the election it triggers some secret clause written into the Constitution in invisible magic ink. One of the candidates that suck still wins.

    I'm genuinely curious, what is supposed to happen if we let them lose? Who does that help besides the slightly shittier candidate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I've read through like this entire comment section, and most of your comments specifically, and I haven't seen it. Care to link or quote the comment where you answer this question? I can't find it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    What? You can't be done doing something you never started doing. You keep saying that your strategy will work, but haven't said how, or given an example of it working, or really provide any kind of evidence or reasoning except repeatedly insisting.

    It really seems like you're the confused one here, mouthing talking points and your personal fears. I already told you my question and you're just deflecting and trying to shift the burden onto me, which makes zero sense since you're making a frankly wild and counter-intuitive claim. Based on the ratios, it seems like most people are in the same boat as me in having no idea how what you're proposing is actually supposed to work.

    I'm not really interested in a schoolteacher role-play with someone so insistent that they're right and everyone else is wrong with zero evidence or justification, especially when you go on to denigrate and belittle people for asking you to show your work.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You are confusing individual action to limit further harm with a candidate's strategy to win votes. They are not the same thing. No one is saying "we want apathetic do-nothings to win" they're saying "I'd rather not have the villians win, if possible"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I wasn't the person you replied to here, but I think we are talking about Palpatine vs Team Rocket here.

    I'd vote for Team Rocket over Palpatine any day of the week.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I don't believe I said that at any point, and I'd encourage you to not try and put words in my mouth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    I think you grossly underestimate my understanding.

    No, my answer does not change. If you take the time to read it rather than blindly respond to me recommending to vote anyway, you may discover why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Yes.

    It is. And I consider it foolish to pretend otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (13 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    No, you clearly did not understand.

    "Not voting" is a message of apathy, not discontent.

    "Not voting" is being OK with things as they are.

    "Not voting" is not taking every avenue possible.

    "Not voting" is nothing more than giving up.

    You should try reading my comment again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    false. I vote every election, I dont vote for everything on the ballot, sometime i leave the ballot empty. two very different things

    So... You didn't "not vote". Cool. What I said. Awesome.

    I think there is some fundamental confusion here that I can't go into your brain and point to.

    spend some time there and understand that there are many people willing to show up for the right candidate but wont show up for the shitshow that is the dem party currently.

    There are many things on a ballot, and many different dems. There are members of the DSA running under the dem ticket. There are members of the WFP running under the dem ticket.

    I will apologize only slightly for the caps here - NOT VOTING SENDS A MESSAGE THAT YOU ARE OK WITH ANY OUTCOME. Whether you want that to be the message or not is inconsequential. If you want to do something about the candidates, DO IT MORE THAN A MONTH AND CHANGE BEFORE AN ELECTION.

    If thats a message you are OK with, go for it.

    I'm not.

    Edit: mobile typo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Thats your intention. That isn't the message.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    No, please stop and think.

    Already did, but sure.

    I'm telling you that you cannot infer what you think your inferring from people who didnt vote.

    I'm not the one who will be doing the inferring. This should be the first thing you try to understand before trying to get me to pretend what you're suggesting is going to make sense (PS: It doesn't).

    The ones who will be doing the inferring are the political strategists. The ones who tell politicians, who tell the DNC and RNC the best strategy for what they want.

    You know that good ol' meme about the overton window? Want to know how it keeps cranking to the right?

    "Leftists aren't voting. To get voters, you'll need to shift right."

    This comes from polling information, from voting records, etc. Not voting is a great way to keep cranking that window to the right.

    They aren't going to bother trying to capture the people not voting.

    This is shown further with systems that allow someone like Mamdani to succeed. They are already working on one approach to capture votes, so they try to prevent situations that will require a strategy change.

    You can obviously do whatever you'd like, I'm encouraging people to vote. I sure as anything won't tell people to not vote and continue decades of the same message, get the same results, and then be mad about those results.

    I also know that if you want to make a difference in who is on the ballot, that doesn't happen after the ballots are set. That was months ago. I put my efforts in to push the people I wanted to then. Some of them are on the ballot, maybe I helped with it, maybe I should have done more, idk. But I did what I could and there are some progressive candidates locally that I wanted that hopefully will get in.

    And if you want to change who is on the ballot too, you should also put in efforts a lot earlier than a month and change before. The deadline has already passed just about everywhere, including last-minute petitions for a vacancy.

    Vote by mail ballots are being prepped (I do not recommend voting by mail, use a drop box).

    Early voting is single digit weeks away.

    The time to complain about who is on the ballot has long since passed.

    Now take a moment and realize that if people didnt complain then, and then don't vote now, what message comes across?

    Not the one you're claiming IMO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Lol, then walk away bro. All I see if you here struggling to prove yourself right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    You're glad we're at war with Iran? You're glad ICE is murdering citizens and disappearing non citizens with impunity? You are 14

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    "I'm grateful people are dying, children are being murdered, and families are being torn apart because I feel like some people realized Trump does bad things" is a pretty shit take IMO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    The scale is quite a bit different, as are many of the actions taken. Let's not ignore reality.

    If there were no actual difference you wouldn't care if Harris lost.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)