agamemnonymous comments on Third time's the charm. Trust me bro. This time it will work.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

I'm mad that you chuckle fucks keep riding the vote harder while continuing to give your support to candidates neither of us, allegedly, want instead of letting those candidates just lose because they literally suck.

What would that accomplish? Sincerely, no one has been able to explain to me how the slightly-less-bad candidate losing provides any benefit whatsoever.

It's not like the other mainstream candidate doesn't also suck, and moreso in fact.

It's not like if enough people sit out the election it triggers some secret clause written into the Constitution in invisible magic ink. One of the candidates that suck still wins.

I'm genuinely curious, what is supposed to happen if we let them lose? Who does that help besides the slightly shittier candidate?

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[+] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

[deleted]

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

I've read through like this entire comment section, and most of your comments specifically, and I haven't seen it. Care to link or quote the comment where you answer this question? I can't find it

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[+] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

[deleted]

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What? You can't be done doing something you never started doing. You keep saying that your strategy will work, but haven't said how, or given an example of it working, or really provide any kind of evidence or reasoning except repeatedly insisting.

It really seems like you're the confused one here, mouthing talking points and your personal fears. I already told you my question and you're just deflecting and trying to shift the burden onto me, which makes zero sense since you're making a frankly wild and counter-intuitive claim. Based on the ratios, it seems like most people are in the same boat as me in having no idea how what you're proposing is actually supposed to work.

I'm not really interested in a schoolteacher role-play with someone so insistent that they're right and everyone else is wrong with zero evidence or justification, especially when you go on to denigrate and belittle people for asking you to show your work.