you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 163 points 2 months ago (98 children)

Plus, they dropped Callaway Golf after their horrific ad depicting violence against women.

Wait... What?

  • source
  • hideshow 98 child comments
  • [–] 220 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (33 children)

    The golf club company ran an ad where a woman went to touch a golf club and her man pushed her down and threatened her for her transgression.

    Costco stopped carrying their clubs in response

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 33 child comments
  • [–] 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    To be fair, it wasn't Callaway directly. It was Good Good Golf, a golf youtube channel, that aired the ad. Callaway had a partnership with them to cobrand the golf club, but dropped Good Good immediately after the ad and canceled the branded club.

    Callaway still deserves the backlash from associating with them though and apparently someone giving the ok for the ad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 months ago* (28 children)

    Does the US not have some kind of advertising standards board that you have to get adverts approved before you're allowed to publicly post them?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 186 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    We don’t have standards keeping the ass parasites out of the lettuce, take a second and ponder

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Thank god it's just lettuce though... Right?

    😆 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    We generally presume companies will choose not to do that to their own reputations, but apparently that presumption was wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    With economies of scale you end up with basically one producer producing stuff for incredibly cheap. Take poultry for example, Tyson is like the only name you'll see at major retailers. Even most store brands are just relabeled Tyson product. So it really doesn't matter to them if they get a couple people sick, cause we're else you gunna go? Blackbird farms, and pay $38 a chicken? Not the very large majority of price sensitive people living paycheck to paycheck.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    While the topic was abhorrent and in bad taste, I don't think there was ever a time when the FCC banned jokes about spouse/family abuse.

    The Honeymooners regularly joked about the husband finally breaking and beating his wife. I Love Lucy had an episode where Lucy tried to get a sunburn so Ricky wouldn't beat her as hard for buying an expensive dress. The Simpsons had Homer choking Bart as a running gag. All these shows were on Broadcast TV.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Costco is, in part, responding to public opinion on how tasteless the ads are. I'm not expecting Costco to organize a boycott of a media company for showing the ad and I'm saying they should.

    What I'm saying is that NO ONE is going to organize a boycott against a company for showing an ad in bad taste, especially if the ad meets standards and practices for the FCC. They'll go after the company paying for the advertisement.

    And I'm not saying it is written in the Constitution that this protection explicitly exists. I'm saying that the culture surrounding that free speech protection gives broadcasters and publishers far less ownership of what the ads they serve say compared to other countries.

    I bring it up because you asked the question about why didn't anybody else stop this ad from being broadcast. Why? Because the risk to everyone else was near zero.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Free speech doesn’t let you say whatever you want to anyone, it’s intention is to protect you while speaking out against government officials and offices.

    It sounds like you're getting freedom of speech mixed up with the First Amendment. They aren't the same thing. The First Amendment's intention is to protect your freedom of speech from the government. If you want your freedom of speech protected from other things (such as your employer), the First Amendment won't protect you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    No sir, no confusion here. You and I both said the same thing. Freedom of speech / free speech are the same thing in the US, a very specific legal construct under the first amendment, which many people don't understand the boundaries of. I have a degree in this field, so I'm pretty up to speed on basic civil rights. Hence why I questioned the other user on why they think costco boycotting callaway because of a gross chud ad had anything to do with a law that deals with government overreach.

    Now if the ad depicted the dude tackling Trump to the ground and threatening him for touching their underage caddy, and the FBI raided their offices in response, NOW we'd be talking about a first amendment issue as that'd be direct political commentary and an illegal response by the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Free speech just protect you from the government, gone out of the window anyway as of late.

    But even when free speech wasn't forced it wouldn't force channels to carry your advertisement.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 88 points 2 months ago (45 children)

    Video of the ad.

    It's such a gross concept. Wild anyone thought this was a funny, gotta be pretty deep in bro to not see red flags.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 45 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    I mean, ‘golf company owner’ is already selecting for the biggest chud in existence.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Personally I think that if you set out to invent the most boring sport you wouldn't be able to beat golf but I accept that some people strangely do find it attractive and they're not all toxic masculinity "alpha" types, so they should really have seen that one coming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I don't like golf, but at least it gives you an afternoon's walk in something resembling nature

    Cricket on the other hand, takes a week to play and is just running back and forth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    There is absolutely nothing about a golf course that resembles nature. It’s nothing but chemicals and underpaid guys with gas fume belching machines.

    If you want a wandering outdoor sport with real nature, try out frisbee golf or field archery. They also have the bonus of not destroying habitats and polluting local waterways with way too much nitrogen fertilizer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Aye and no. Don't get me wrong, golf courses are as you say fertiliser polluted and lacking in biodiversity. But the rough, surrounding the whole course, and the woods they're often placed in certainly resemble nature. There's still birds, foxes, squirrels, etc, going about.

    Certainly in Scotland at least, which is my only personal experience of courses. And being the home of golf I don't think it's disingenuous for me to use that as a basis for the claim.

    I have seen videos and pictures of courses in places like Florida though and if a Scottish course is a tragedy of nature, a Florida course is an abomination.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Like what is the point they are trying to make even?

    Is the club so fragile that it'll break if touched?

    Golfers are seriously superstitious?

    Women suck and can't golf?

    If anything it would have been a better commercial to do the opposite, hand the club out to literally everyone that's playing and they all hit better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    That was so much more fucked up than I expected. This has to be intentional, it is very hard to believe that anyone thought this made for a good commercial in any way other than to appeal to chuds who enjoy violence against women. It is blatant and explicit, the mask is off.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (17 children)

    Even if it was a guy pushing another guy I don't see how that would've ever been a funny spoof skit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    There was no way to salvage this.

    Say the guy had just grabbed the woman's arm or put his arm in front of her to stop her instead. You still have that threat he makes towards her.

    Even if that threat was changed to "no one touches my club except me", you still have that underlying implication of a threat.

    There's no universe that could've salvaged this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm NGL, initially i thought "This is probably one of those wacky ads taken out of context." And no, it's really really super gross. There's nothing humorous about it, it's just a really serious ad about pushing down and threatening a woman who touches your golf club.

    It wouldn't be any better if the victim was a man either. The fact that there's no other words except 'the victim' is telling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 41 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Looked it up, apparently they did an Obsession parody, but no one got the reference so it looked like the CEO of the company just pushed a woman to the ground for trying to touch his golf clubs.

    I've seen the ad, I didn't get the reference either. I haven't seen Obsession, but apparently that's what that was in reference to.....

    If you have to be told what the reference is, you're probably not doing references right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Thank you for the context! I've seen the ad in passing and really for the life of me, couldn't understand why anyone thought that was a good idea. Now I kinda get it. It's still terrible, but at least it's not just "haha, hurting women funny".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Na, I'm cool with buying second hand preemo stuff. My money isn't going to them, and no one is going to notice the logo flying 300 yards through the air.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    A woman reaches for his club and he violently SHOVES her to the ground. How is that in any way not violence against a woman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] a comment that isn't shown here: deleted, from someone you've blocked, or on another page. view the thread from it
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)