you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Until people can buy a computer CHEAPLY and easily at Walmart with a distro preinstalled, Linux isn't going to make a lot of headway very fast. They are too lazy to be bothered to download a distro, make a bootable iso, wipe and do a fresh install.

And yes, they are that lazy unless really pushed to do it.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    That's the link you need to break. Until then, Linux is stuck as an also ran.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    That's the refusal to learn. People really hate learning anything new these days. And that includes many here.

    Still, there is hope. With the common idea of "App Stores" really taking hold with users, thanks to the ubiquity of cell phone ownership and Chromebooks, users are comfortable with a software manager that gets referred to as App Store. And distros are starting to act upon that by simply rename their software management software and adding a colorful friendly UI to it. It's marketing.

    There are 1000's of programs available that can meet almost every "regular user's" daily needs. What is lacking is a universal packaging format that is easy to use. Ubuntu has their "we dropped the ball" Snaps and Fedora pushes Flatpaks. AppImages also exist, but not to the extent as Flatpaks and are a bit more of a hassle to use than a Flatpak. And it appears that Flatpaks are currently leading as the universal software management race. If all distros were to agree to one package format, that would remove one of the biggest hurdles and kills the .exe argument. And that seems unlikely at this point in time. Even die hard Linux users will argue against it. But until at least the most common distros hop on that bus, Windows users will resist your KDE laptop.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Even when I offered my father to do this for him, even picking Zorin OS (since it seems to be decently close to a Windows look and feel). He refused stating that he's not techsavvy enough to use it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Do you know the Secretary Problem?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_problem

    Your father's been using computers for some number of years. It's possible he's been using computers for longer than he will continue using computers. From his perspective, the current edition of Windows is better than anything that's come before it, so it's the rational choice to stick with it until the end.

    To get around this, you would basically need to set up a second machine with Zorin so that he can get some context before making a decision. That way, in the very realistic scenario where he decides it's not for him, he hasn't lost anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)