you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, bg3 is more Divinity Souls 3 than BG3...

They just slapped some BG paint on top of it.

Trying to find a studio that can make a sequel to that isn't going to work out well. They need to make the tough call of finding another studio that will take the franchise and make a good game how they know how to make a good game.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    I would love it if someone made a modernized successor to BG2. Real-time with pause. Probably something other than D&D 2.x - then again maybe something based on an osr ttrpg ruleset could be interesting (look, I just don't like thac0). At least a full 6 member party, and full party control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    They're gonna learn all the wrong lessons from bg3 and copy it

    The lesson should be to let studios do what they're good at. They need to find a good studio they trust, give them BG4, and trust them to make a good game even if fundamentally different than bg3 or bg2.

    It's the antithesis of COD or Madden that release carbon copies every year, give people a new game with a familiar setting

  • source
  • parent