Yep
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 45 points 1 year ago (27 children)
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Then you can generate a password so big and complex, the site or app starts begging you to stop. At that moment, you can say "ur password system is weak."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Careful with that. Sometimes a site will allow you to use some stupid long password when you sign up, but then it turns out that some other version of the site or an app for it on other platforms won't accept a password that long!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    That's okay, I just want to hear "it's too big"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Or alternatively, it allows you to enter a password as long as you like, but on their end it gets truncated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    My e-mail provider does this. I wanted to change my password to some 64 character long generated string. It accepted, but I could not log in after that. After a few tries, I found the reason and, after another few tries, also the limit at which it gets truncated: 16 characters! God, how I hate them for this...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Perhaps even worse than this is when the hash allows you to enter what you think is your full password, but as long as the first characters are a match then it will succeed.
    16 characters is probably fine as far as passwords go, but if the site is secretly truncating from 16 down to, say, 7 and still allows you to sign in, you don't even realize that your password isn't nearly as secure as you thought it was.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Almost, but KeepassDX is better 😎

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's not a service you're paying for. It is just a password manager.

    Though tbh, I don't know all of bitwardens spesific details.

    It's at least open source, but can you have your passwords stored anywhere other than their servers? What if the company changes path - can you just use another fork or are you stuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Bitwarden is self-hostable and foss, with some unofficial software already out there. Not much opportunity for the company to entrap customers if it went evil.

    IMO, for most people it's best to just send them to register at bitwarden. It's less hassle so they might actually follow through, while being infinitely better than what they were doing before.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (4 children)
  • Arghh, why is every company thinking, that AI will make them valuable...

    "Let AI retrieve, generate and manage all your credentials"

    Yeah a definite nope, for what reason do I use bitwarden? So that exactly this doesn't happen...

    Anyway vaultwarden is what I'm using, much more performant and self-contained, compatible to bitwarden (but you need to host it, obviously)...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    Or just use the built in password managers in chrome or Firefox. No need to pay for a password manager when they are free on the browsers most people already use

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No need to pay

    I didn't say anything about paying. It's free in both meanings of the word.

    It's also cross-platform and -browser and better than builtin ones.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Fair enough but both the chrome and Firefox password managers are cross platform and can be exported and imported supporting the ability to move away from them in the future should you choose. So for a first step from having insecure passwords to a password manager that gives strong passwords for someone who doesnt even want to rema strong password in the first place, they are good steps in the right direction. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

    Funnily enough, I almost said that to the keepass person. But there are some upsides. I've seen people find the separate extension ui easier because it doesn't blend into browser settings.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I wouldn't recommend that. Bitwarden is free and works on any device, and doesn't tie you to a browser. What if you want to switch browsers someday?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments