you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 66 points 5 months ago (10 children)

what is this even in reference to? what is our "liberal Democrat friend" also livid about?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 81 points 5 months ago (9 children)

    Oh, the mayoral election in LA. The republicans nominee came in third and won’t be moving on. It will be two democrats battling it out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 5 months ago

    Outrageous! As a liberal from LA who is also the leader of antifa and worked under Bernie and AOC i am sickened. I don't see why it would matter. Unless the Gop is running a progressive, and even then it would be iffy, I don't think they'd win in LA anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago

    As a very real Republican, I'm perfectly fine with this. I can see how I must now pick my least not-favorite liberal in order to protect this democracy that I constantly claim to support. I believe laws apply equally.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Isn't that not even uncommon for Cali? Anyways def a fake text, no reason to be "livid" and that's a republican-coded word anyways

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Usually the Republicans consolidate their candidates before the California primary so they get one in the runoff. It's a sadly consistent 30ish percent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (2 children)

    Interesting. But they always lose to the establishment dem anyways, and in this election they'll just vote for them over the progressive, so nothing's likely to be different...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments