you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 162 points 7 months ago (20 children)

She is supposed to testify about the Epstein files again on the 14th. Coincidence?

Also, there are blatant incompetents all over this administration. Notably Hegseth and Patel have both been rumored to be on the chopping block at various points. It's telling that so far only the women are being punished. And replaced with men.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [+] 80 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    And then so many con women will be as pikachu-faced as so many trad wives are right now..."wait? all that manly toxic bullshit I've been repeating as well is going to be applied to me, too?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Because the white bobbleheaded bimbos they put into visible positions of power were intended to be scapegoats from the beginning. You don't think this administration actually thinks women should be in politics or even respected as human beings, do you? The end goal is Handmaid's Tale.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I always view most of the females in his admin as a version of Serena.

    When they show the "before times"; she is the one pitching all of the crazy; turns out she ends up just like today's trad wives seem to. The leopards ate her face....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    There was also Bovino who's been replaced. It's not been just women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    It may be nitpicking, but Bovino was just removed from leading the operation in Minneapolis. He kept his job and was allowed to retire. He was rumored to have been headed for retirement before the ops fuckups in MN. I'm sure that the administration hastened his timeline, but he was spared the indignity of a public firing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    She already testified once about Epstein. Didn't amount to anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    But this time the Dow is below 50,000. By Bondi's own rules, stuff matters again.

    Seriously though, while there were no consequences for the administration other than looking dumb, she made them look really fucking dumb. She would have to answer new questions about the shady and sloppy redactions, the disappearing documents specifically related to Trump, and the fact that despite the order for full release, only around half of the files were ever made available. She already demonstrated that she can't handle pressure. I think they're worried that it could go even worse the next time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    I don't know, but I somewhat suspect that she let them, or someone, know that she's going to cover her own ass over Trump's. She'll eventually be held for contempt of Congess, whether it's while Trump is in office or after (assuming there is an after). Maybe she saw the writing on the wall that there will be consequences and got the fuck out while she could. If I'm in charge, she'd still face severe consequences, but I'm not, and I wouldn't be surprised if she faces next to none now.

  • source
  • parent