you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 80 points 8 months ago (16 children)
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It isn't always that simple. It could lead to age verification requirements

    You seem to be under the impression that gambling is illegal only for children in New York, but that's not what's happening here, gambling is illegal in New York for all ages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I didn't think about that. That is kind of a nightmare scenario. I still stand by what I said. Now the question is, do I trust legislation to make a good decision that doesn't fuck over everyone in the end? And if so, do I trust a multi-billion dollar company to not do some horrendous malicious compliance?

    ... and I'm not going to answer these questions. :|

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago* (9 children)

    implement age verification on games with loot boxes. watch sales crash. stop making loot box funded games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    At the expense of everyone's privacy even if you don't participate in the loot box economy, because you know the laws won't be written for only if you access them it'll be a blanket requirement. That's not the way to get rid of loot boxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    What is the way to get rid of loot boxes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Straight up ban them. No age gate, no nothing. Just no more loot boxes. It's worse than a fucking casino and those should be banned too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The line between banning loot boxes and banning games like Balatro is a very fine one, with a need to specify that what is being banned is monetary transactions to access lottery pools.

    That kind of accuracy and genuine intent is not what is currently present in lawmaking in most countries.

    I hope I'm wrong about this, but I don't think I am.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    I don't think the line is that fine in that case, considering all random mechanics in Balatro give ephemeral rewards that only last until the end of a run, which is an isolated instance of a game with limited playtime, those mechanics cannot be paid for with real money, the resulting rewards cannot be sold for real money or traded with other players, and generally cannot affect any other players in any way, not even visually through cosmetics.

    As far as I know, Balatro is only really being targeted because it's stylized after poker, with the enforcement having no actual understanding of what the gameplay looks like.

    I think at bigger risk from actual laws would be MMORPGs where you can get random loot drops from enemies/chests, and those also tend to have markets where people grind valuable drops and use in-game trading to transfer them to other players in exchange for real money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Don't know. That's not my specialty.

    But it's definitely not by compromising everyone's privacy and forcing them to identify themselves because the government wants to be able to identify everyone everywhere at all times and uaing children as the excuse like they always do.

  • source
  • parent