39
Goodbye EV sales mandate. Hello purchase rebates. Carney shakes up Canada's auto industry (www.cbc.ca)
submitted 9 months ago by to c/canada@lemmy.ca
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Up to $5,000 business or lease incentives coming for EVs

The government is unveiling its new national automotive strategy aimed at protecting Canada’s auto sector and jobs in the face the U.S. President Donald Trump's desire to move vehicle production to the U.S. Ottawa is also trying to jump-start the country's battery-powered vehicle industry.

Carney expects his new emissions system will lead to 75 per cent of new cars sold in Canada being electric by 2035 — an ambitious goal, but still less than the previous mandate that Carney is ditching.

. . .

Carney announced the Liberal government is also launching a new $2.3-billion program to offer consumers and businesses purchase or lease incentives of up to $5,000 for EVs and up to $2,500 for plug-in hybrids.

Plug-in vehicles must be under $50,000 to qualify and be made by countries Canada has free trade agreements with, which would exclude any vehicles made in China. The price cap will not apply to Canadian-made vehicles.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

$5000 for a single electric vehicle is what, 10% or less of purchase price?

$500 for a single electric bike would be 10-50% the purchase price of an electric bike (with $5000 being a high end cargobike).

That's 10x the number of Canadians that can use the funds.

That lowers the floor for Canadians to access the rebate.

That means taking vehicles off the road and reducing road and health liabilities for Canadian cities and provinces.

It is much easier for a bicycle manufacturer to pop up than an entire electric car chain. (Some of the struggling ones might hope the border to become Canadian made).

Yes, this differs replacing gas cars in more rural areas. But it can take the majority of car trips and eliminate then; rather than just electrify them.

It can also position Canada to be a leader in electric bikes, rather than a subsidiary of foreign car companies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 9 months ago* (1 child)

    I like the way you think, but let's not kid ourselves that the pool of people who "would drive a car as their main transportation" is anything close to the pool of people who would do so with an electric bike.

    Don't get me wrong, I love the idea of a generous rebate on bikes. I just think if the goal is emissions reductions, an EV rebate is bound to be more effective, even factoring in the differences.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 9 months ago

    I think the pool can be quite large. The main issue is that it is almost always more convenient to drive than bike right now.

    That isn't because cars are inherently more convenient, its because we've been making them more convenient for a decade. Some examples of this.

    1. Parking: look at the massive land use that we dedicate to storing vehicles, and then give away for free. Obviously it's not free to whoever builds and maintains them, so that cost is just passed on to everyone to increase the convince of cars.

    2. Traffic lights: cars and trains are the only vehicles that require lighted signals. Everyone else at an intersection gets slowed down so that cars can drive faster in between them. In my city of Kingston, pretty much every major road is 60kph+, but my average driving travel speed is always <35kph. Lights even inconvenience drivers, they're just trained to accept it as normal, and are rewarded with faster travel between lights.

    3. Lanes: cars get a travel lane everywhere. Pedestrians usually get one. Bikes get fucked.

    You can see this in action where cities that increase bicycle infrastructure and make it more convenient, get an increase in mode share.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent