Canadians: Greenland must be the line in the sand. Non negotiable.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Who is going to be WW2 America in this metaphor?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    A Russian-China spearheaded alliance. Who else would want to gain from American military chaos

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Sir, Russia can't complete a 3 day special operation. If China had the will and firepower to stop the US they'd be able to do it without Russia.

    And we don't know if China would actually team up with the EU to fight the US, or let both sides weaken each other while they take over Taiwan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 10 months ago

    When China says they're not interested in full, overseas military adventurism, I actually believe them. China is so big, unwieldy and diverse that even in good times it's hard to keep it stable internally, and one thing the Chinese government is VERY good at is taking an EXTREMELY long-term view of its actions. If China decides to act against the US, it will be in myriad subtle and indirect ways that accomplish its goals without sudden shock and exposure.

    Incidentally, the US itself is also a fantastic example of why China WON'T do that. Post WW2, with very few exceptions, almost EVERY instance of US military adventurism has ended in failure, or at the very least, not gained the US anything compared to the losses. But the US's work in soft power, partnerships, and containment? That brought down the Soviet Union without firing a single shot.

    China won't be stupid enough to try to take America's place by using the US's loser tactics - it will do it using their successful ones.

  • source
  • parent