▲ 433 ▼ Still out there (mander.xyz) submitted 11 months ago by L501@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago (3 children) How big is its genome? There isn't much in a virus. People can replicate a lot of them from purely data. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) How many distinct genomes are there that we include under the label "smallpox"? It's also a great deal more complicated than simply storing the genome - much as gene expression in humans is more complicated than simply "this is what the DNA says", it's also more complicated than that for viruses. We're finally to the point that we can simulate interactions, but it's -absolutely- not a trivial thing to do (supercomputer shit) and simply saving the source material prevents any risk of loss of information. permalink fedilink source parent [+] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago It's actually very real machines, doing extremely well controlled chemical reactions, and no AI unless you count all computer software as AI (ok, processors have neural networks controlling them nowadays, so just "normal" amount of AI). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) How many distinct genomes are there that we include under the label "smallpox"? It's also a great deal more complicated than simply storing the genome - much as gene expression in humans is more complicated than simply "this is what the DNA says", it's also more complicated than that for viruses. We're finally to the point that we can simulate interactions, but it's -absolutely- not a trivial thing to do (supercomputer shit) and simply saving the source material prevents any risk of loss of information. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago It's actually very real machines, doing extremely well controlled chemical reactions, and no AI unless you count all computer software as AI (ok, processors have neural networks controlling them nowadays, so just "normal" amount of AI). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 1 point 11 months ago It's actually very real machines, doing extremely well controlled chemical reactions, and no AI unless you count all computer software as AI (ok, processors have neural networks controlling them nowadays, so just "normal" amount of AI). permalink fedilink source parent