you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -9 points 11 months ago* (8 children)

And what about Linux?

Every distro has supported 64-bit programs for the last decade. Why aren't you able to run 64-bit programs?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Correct, so why does steam on linux still run as a 32 bit app and require 32 bit libraries to run games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 11 months ago* (5 children)

    steam itself is moving towards 64-bit on linux on well, but fact is that most games are 32-bit and linux doesn't have the same compatibility guarantees as windows since you can just recompile software to run on new systems. you can't do that with old games, so you need multilib.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

    I believe wine has a WoW64 implementation now, to allow 32 bit software to run on 64 bit wine prefixes. Which means any windows games (unless they are 16 bit) can work on 64 bit non-multi-arch system.

    Linux games are the core problem. But they also have a Steam Runtime where they ship the entire runtime libraries needed to run a game for compatibility reasons... and Steam Runtime 4.0 (which just shipped and/or announced a few days ago?) is set up for only 64 bit systems.

    So if the answer is:

    • Steam itself can be 64 bit, and is moving that direction
    • Windows games can be 64 bit only due to proton/wine handling the 32bit translation in WoW64
    • Linux games themselves can be any architecture since the steam runtime manages the libraries for the games.

    Then the answer is just "they're getting around to it, they are only just now getting around to it for windows, and linux is a lower priority" because clearly its all possible.

    So "What about linux?" is just asking if there is a timeline for the speed that things are moving in that direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments