168
CHAT CONTROL 2.0 THROUGH THE BACK DOOR – Breyer warns: "The EU is playing us for fools – now they’re scanning our texts and banning teens!" (www.patrick-breyer.de)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Has it ever been leaked who it is that's pushing for chat control so hard? It's almost comical at this point

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Leaked? It's public knowledge. Danish civilians are just too cowardly to show these authoritarians who are the actual bosses.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That scrotum is just the current driver, but they're probably referring to some unnamed lobbying group that's been pushing for this for years. I'm not sure the identity of that group was ever revealed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

    … comrade, everything in the EU is public. Capitalists in parliament are capitalists, their lobby is public:
    You are their slave, they are your Masters.
    You do not deserve privacy, they do.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    No, I was referring to the HLG that helped draft this legislation. We know who in the EU sent out the invitations, but requests to find out who was in the grouo were denied.

    https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/networks/high-level-group-hlg-access-data-effective-law-enforcement_en

    This is still (afaik) not public information.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Did you follow the links on the PDFs? Their names & draft sites are all cited throughout the citations.

    e.g. Written submission: EDRi

    1. Bill Goodwin, Dutch lawyers raise human rights concerns over hacked cryptophone data, Computer Weekly (October 2022) https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252526497/Dutch-lawyers-raise-human-rights-concerns-over-hacked-cryptophone-data
      Letter available at: https://media.licdn.com/dms/document/media/D4E1FAQHyO5aQ3qvwBQ/feedshare-document-pdf-analyzed/0/1666528452891?e=1709769600&v=beta&t=e1EzhDjzuCV_O82MNHFrYo49bw-zVTrtVtNT62FyZZE (in Dutch)
    2. European Court of Human Rights, Case of Yüksel Yalçinkaya v. Türk ye (Application No. 15669/20) Judgment, İ https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-227636
    3. According to the Arrested Lawyers initiative, “the government claims that anybody who may have downloaded it is, in fact, a “ter- rorist.” The Arrested Lawyers Initiative, Report on the legal and technical issues around Turkey’s malicious ByLock Prosecutions, November 2021, available at: https://arrestedlawyers.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/report-bylock-november-2021.pdf
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •