I know what compromise looks like and I reward it when I see it.

... I will not keep falling in line for candidates that would rather lose than listen to me...

I rest my case.

Do you not feel the irony of calling that out when the winner of both of those elections was trump?

To use a phrase... If I had a nickel for every time we've elected orange Hitler, I'd have two nickles, but it's weird that it happened twice.

Okay. I meant to imply that any democracy (practically by definition) is based on compromise, which is why I said that straight up instead of snarkily (and unhelpfully) bashing the USA.

As for the Hillary-Bernie thing... At then end of the primary, Hillary had like 3 million more votes than Bernie did. Notably, Bernie conceeded to Hillary and even campaigned for her, because he knew that she was much better than trump, and democracy is inherently a compromise.

YES

Stop condescending me

No. You're wilfully harmful takes actively deserve that as you seek to hurt unrelated people for the actions of people who will be completely insulated from your tantrum.

Kamala campaigning with Liz Cheney daughter of deceased war criminal Dick Cheney while utterly silencing Palestinian voices was what lost the US presidential election

Maybe the first part, but any people who protest voted over the Palestinians have the blood of the thousands more that have been killed on their hands as a direct result.

You cannot simply ignore the world just because its not the way you want it to be.

No, this is a tea party moment for the left, we don’t need the Democratic Party

The movement that ultimately still voted for republicans when the time came for the most part as it was incredibly small because anyone who understand math understands that in a winner takes all/first past the post system you can't have more than 2 main parties?

they need us and they are still refusing to behave like they do.

No. You have it backwards. They're fine with losing. You aren't. You and people you must be pretending to care about get fucked when they lose. They know that, and so you aren't making them stop and think, you're just fucking yourself and others harder.

You do know that when you start insulting your opponent you’ve both lost the argument and shown your ass, right?

No, I don't know that, because its something people without actual points in their favour bust out when they feel the other person has been too blunt.

In this case, the other person wishes to harm a significant amount of people. I owe them no apologies, and the only people showing their asses are the people treating significant, real life politics like a game and as if they were children flipping all the pieces off because they didn't win.

Hopefully one day you’ll realize that you are the problem, that it is you carrying water for the right-wing party that together with the far-right-wing party have turned the good ole USA into a right-loving hellhole, slowly but surely over the last 50 years or so.

The thing about this child like understanding of this easy to understand system where only 2 parties will ever have a chance due to the math of it being a first past the post/winner takes all system, is that the very obvious only way to change said system without tremendous blood shed, is by slowly transitioning the party closest to your goals over time. Because this can't be completed faster than a short on tiktok or youtube, you get enraged and think the whole system can never be fixed. Do you have a solution? Of course you don't though. You'd instead have it get more broken, harming you and your causes more.

and lesser-evil voting fail to do anything.

This by itself is tremendously ignorant to the massive differences in policy between the 2 parties. All of this comment is filled with impotent irate ignorance.