There are already some huge maps out there, Just Cause 2 and 3 both have maps at around 1000km^2^, and those games are beloved by their players. But if the next Cyberpunk game was announced with Night City now being the size of an actual large metropolis, say like New York, would you say that's too big? What determines what "too big" is?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

For example, Fallout 3 doesn't do a great job of this, as much of the world is baren with no story or gameplay. Half of the world feels like it could be cut out without much loss. The Yakuza games on the other hand, have smaller worlds but they feel massive and fun because there's always something to do moments away.

On the other hand, the world of Fallout 4 feels very cramped; you can't go 5 meters without encouraging something. Bethesda's games are interesting in this aspect – the worlds of different games are built similarly, but they differ in some small parameters (as in the density of Fallout 4), so they're ripe for comparison.

Personally, I feel there were two peaks in Bethesda's worlds – Morrowind and Skyrim. Both for different reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    As a Morrowind enjoyer, I find Skyrim to be too shallow. There's 7 weapons in the game, 7 spells, and nothing really to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I was mostly only thinking about Skyrim's world. Skyrim as a whole has many flaws.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, looking at it in a strictly dungeon distribution lens it's actually pretty solid, and I find it feels a little crowded when you mod in more locations. I guess world distribution is the one thing they actually got right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment