210
ICE buys tool to monitor millions of smartphones. Experts say it’s dangerous (www.independent.co.uk)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

In a redacted acquisition document obtained by the tech news site 404 Media, the immigration agency proposes entering into a contract to buy “all-in-one” tools from a company called PenLink that will allow agents to “compile, process, and validate billions of daily location signals from hundreds of millions of mobile devices.” The document also mentions payments for services involving “face detection,” “advanced face search,” and a “dark web data feed.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I'm well aware of this, the reason I bring up GOS is because it fully disables your phone's radios when you turn them off, meaning cell tower triangulation and GPS do not work at all unless explicitly enabled.

This as opposed to a typical phone, which leaves GPS on even when location is off and pings towers periodically even when service is inactive.

I personally leave my phone in airplane mode with location/camera/microphone disabled at all times unless I explicitly need them. I use wifi calling so I can still use it as a typical phone and per-connection MAC address randomization (+ a VPN on public wifi) so my device isn't easy to track via IP.

GOS is great for this because I can be reasonably assured that apps are not bypassing my permission settings without my knowledge and consent. (That and I can de-google which in and of itself goes a long way in decreasing trackability)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    Reminder that you can make a faraday bag that actually works out of duct tape and conductive tape. And/or Or enough layers of duct tape and aluminum tape. And/or copper that's.

    You need to make sure there's a really tight seal but. It's doable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Isn't GPS only one way? Is the phone then sending the data to the carrier?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    I'm a bit confused by your question...GPS definitely requires communication between your phone and a satellite (i.e. can't track you if your GPS unit is off - maybe you're thinking of satellite imaging?). EDIT: This is actually incorrect, see comments below

    With wifi calling, yes, data is being sent to the carrier, but not via a signal that can be triangulated, so the most accurate location data they can gather is your IP address, which a VPN can easily hide.

    Or do you mean in terms of generalized location tracking? In which case yes, highly accurate location data is shared by your phone with your carrier by default, just by way of how cellular networks function; no GPS required.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    My understanding of GPS is your phone uses satellite positions to figure out it's location. The satellites are not receiving info from your phone/Garmin.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    I think the problem is that once your phone knows its location from GPS, google and apps can access this data. The data is then shared with advertisers and also, you know, government agencies.

    Unfortunately, even just the names of nearby WiFi networks and Bluetooth connections can be used to determine location. If apps and google services have access to this info, they still have location data on you, even with your cell and GPS radios disabled.

    Supposedly GOS doesn't allow google or apps to access the location data unless you allow it, which is nice.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent