Genuine question. Seemed to be super hyped and now I don't hear much about it. Steam charts have 300k as highest player count but now it's around 60-80k players.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No, it did not, and concurrent players is a very bad metric to use for something like this. They sold north of 3.5M copies. At $40 each, that's about $100M. Even looking at concurrent players, right now, at 98k players, it's the 14th most played game on Steam, so with the information you did use, as a paid game and not free to play, it would be hard to say that it flopped.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] [S] -6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Selling doesn't mean anything to me. Companies don't make a game just so people can play it for one day. (Well... Some do.. (the day before))

    There are LOTS of games that sold really well and then just died right away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You see, that's your problem. Companies don't make games for any other reason than money. Since there are no microtransactions or subscriptions available, they quite frankly don't care if you ever play the game after you've purchased it.

    They moved a lot of units already and considering it's only a side game with reused assets, they made a profit. Therefore, the game by all means is a success for them, even if nobody would play anymore.

    Concurrent players also shouldn't influcene future sales by much, since you only need 3 people at a time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment