[–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

God forbid people enjoy their lives instead of trying to minmax their lifespan.

It's good to be informed when something is risky or bad for you, but people can decide what to do with their own body.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I could see mysleft showing up in armour at least but then I know there would be at least one time "too late to ditch the armour... I'll change when I get there"

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    So a couple of things. Just so ya know, when The Onion started in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, it did not loudly announce itself as satire the way people view it now. Early print issues were laid out exactly like a local newspaper.

    Yep, I know. If you were riding the DC Metro in those days you'd find the paper edition in paper dispensers right next to the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal (pre-Murdoch ownership). I think I may have a couple of the old ones in a box somewhere.

    You’re also wrongly assuming satire must: Be obviously humorous.

    I never assumed satire had to be humorous. I said the Onion was satire, and it was humorous.

    We’re Twilight Zone/Black Mirror,/J.G. Ballard/early cyberpunk (before the game) journalism, not current era Onion listicle satire.

    You're making my point for me. All of those sources were known to the consumers as fiction and allowed to consumer to compare reality against that speculative future. You're not doing that. You are well aware that most folks that read what you're writing assume its true. You can't have it both ways.

    And let’s not overlook the fact that tomorrow or the day after, or soon, many of my articles will no longer be fiction.

    I think you've moved beyond satire and are headed toward disinformation now.

    tl;dr: Explaining the joke, ruins the joke.

    Well hang on, you just said your intent wasn't humor. Wouldn't that make your actions humor at the expense of people reading what you're making up?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Can I ask what your goal is? You're referencing the Onion which is a satire site. The Onion's goal is to entertain, and provide some social commentary with the protection of satire. Also with the Onion, it is well known it is satire. Readers are "in on the joke". Your description from the sidebar doesn't look like that.

    The way I read your sidebar message is that all (most?) news in the world is fake and that no news from any source should be trusted at all. It also reads like you're taking joy it deceiving the readers. The sidebar language suggests no one should trust anything. Am I taking your wrong message or is that what you intended?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›