Unless we consider every manager above the manager directly responsible all the way to the top, just sounds like a way for them to scapegoat someone and get away scotfree.

Sounds like they should be trying to prevent obviously foreseeable issues then.

Sounds great, but shitloads of tiny laws have to be changed and shitloads of precedent overthrown, not as easy as it sounds I'm sure.

Forgot about that! Just tried it.

As a rule, strong feelings about issues do not emerge from deep understanding.

Sweet! K3s is great! Running game instances on k8s is what got me into it in the first place

This is everything I’ve ever wanted to say about AI at my job, plus things I never would’ve thought of, perfectly articulated, well-cited, and emphasized with poignant graphics. I’m floored.

?

I fail to see how you got the idea I support LLMs or their companies from my post.

Don't we have a bunch of these already, not least lat/lon rounded down to some precision? Why another?

Fantastic write-up!

Don't trust anything on the internet should have really never gone away.

i am from Kentucky. i run a k3s cluster at unhelpful.observer, which my online friends use to play multiplayer dwarf fortress succession games on different days of the week

no it is a goddess as opposed to a mythical creature

closer to the greek gods yea but far as i know no one practices that religion, regardless those are pretty lazy names as well

Maybe I am immune to responsibility and I just haven't tried it out yet.

Deny justice long enough and you shouldn't be surprised when the people extract their own form in the worst way possible.

In before managers become minimum wage contract gig economy workers. Gotta Weasle word proof it somehow.

Well good news then I guess.

That's exactly what needs to be done

Yeah, pretty much that exact window. Before that it was dont trust ANYTHING on the internet.

There's a difference for a one-time fine that covers continued wrong doing over a period of time, and a fine about a specific instance of misbehaviour.

The first don't accrue, and I agree, should be based on revenue so that they serve as actual punishment and serve as future deterrent.

But a €250k that can be slapped by thousands of cases that happen every day (AI providing wrong information) has the potential to be massive as well.

I think the point other people are making is that this can set precedent in German law and allow other people with similar issues to bring suit and win on merit and not have to fight as hard for their case to be considered. It could also end up inspiring similar cases in other countries using similar frameworks, adapted for local laws.

If suddenly Alphabet has thousands people taking to them to court in jurisdictions all over the world, that can indeed hurt them, although it will take longer than injunctions on Google now, I fully agree.

ChatGPT can't discuss Brian Hood because he sued them (it shuts down if you bring him up).

We should all have the option to opt out of being discussed by LLM models. In fact, it should probably be an opt-in process. Not being discussed should be the default.

We were told not to use Wikipedia for reports

Yeah maybe in 2003.

Detention of its managers might have more impact.