[–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

It replaces a cable with an overly complex potentiometer with circuit board and wiring that will fail and be irreplaceable 10 Years after the vehicle is Sold, rendering it unuseable.

you mean a TPS? Easily replaced. Before that, throttle cables would get stuck after a few years of dirt and corrosion.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Why do you think they wanted electric steering

    Lighter and more reliable than hydraulic powered steering

    and to get rid of throttle cables

    drive by wire is more reliable and saves fuel

    and “safe” automatic braking? Control. They can lock your doors and drive you anywhere, they can slam on your brakes as a semi truck is behind you if they deem you a threat to dear Leader.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (9 children)

    Sure do.

    And disagree. It replaces a cable with an overly complex potentiometer with circuit board and wiring that will fail and be irreplaceable 10 Years after the vehicle is Sold, rendering it unuseable.

    Every "improvement" on cars has been war on removing your ability to fix anything yourself or keep a car for life. Its all throwaway trash now made to stick you on a lifelong subscription while recording your every move (now with cameras inside too yay)

    Remember, "safety" and "protect the children" is how they take all your freedoms away. And it works because people are stupid.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (10 children)

    People thought we were crazy when we said they were tracking and recording your every single move with phones (I said this for years before it was mainstream). Now why do you think they need surveillance centers? more data storage. because everything is tracked and controlled to influence politics, get rid of undesireables etc.

    We are way beyond tinfoil hats here bud. If you dont think they have control over every single aspect of your life, youre the delusional one.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    No, there are many convenient things you can do with having cars connect to the Internet. I don't agree that that's the answer to this problem.

    The answer is that Stallman was right, software should be free as in freedom (i.e. among other things, modifiable by the user), and that includes software that powers cars. If we lived in that world, cars would only connect to the Internet for purposes chosen by the user.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    But actually though, he's not wrong. Waymo, Tesla self driving mode, they can remote shut off any tesla they want, people have hacked cars before, it's kind of a whole thing.

    They seemingly haven't showed their entire hand just yet, so far waymos only forcibly detain and (legally speaking) kidnap people when they detect [CRIME] rather than driving them to the police station, but there's no reason they couldn't do that, it is physically possible, the only thing stopping it is "the guy hasn't pressed that button yet" in essence, but they likely will.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (20 children)

    They can lock your doors and drive you anywhere,

    ...............k

    EDIT: TIP OF THE DAY: IF YOU'RE GOING TO REPLY, TRY FUCKING READING WHAT I QUOTED AND COMPARE IT TO WHAT I DIDN'T QUOTE AND USE YOUR FUCKING BRAIN TO GET SOME FUCKING CONTEXT.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    It would depend on the features lost (I've heard rumours that some cars lock the trays or reclining the seats behind the modem access) and on whether such a modification would run afoul of the certification processes needed to keep the car on the street, legally speaking.

    For much less mental health hassle, I could simply search for an older car.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›