[–] 30 points 2 months ago

Most elevators are legally required to have a fire key for fire service to be able to take over use of the elevator.

Also completely unrelated, did you know most standard keys that are legally required are often public information. You can often just find the keyring in legal documents.

  • source
  • [–] 74 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Property managers argue that heavy users should pay more. Direct fees create a funding stream for electricity and repairs that flat condo fees never quite cover.

    So they're saying that they're incompetent managers who don't have a sufficient rainy day fund for unexpected expenses, and can't even plan ahead for obvious, anticipated maintenance and repair expenses.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    If this is added to an existing building this is a violation of tenant laws. The facility that was free when you moved in is now not available and that isn't allowed.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    It's not a dating app, its for like exposing men and talking about it, only woman can join and its id verified, but all the woman ik discuss all that amongst themselves and don't need an app, they already have community. I guess it is for ppl who sleep with strangers using those apps? idk, will never be my problem lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    this skips interaction and personality connections that you get in live encounters.

    See, the problem is that those people aren't going out enough to interact with strangers. Men are increasingly unlikely to make a move because there's both the fear of rejection and the fear of an overreaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'm old so maybe not relevant, but I think all those dating apps are stupid.

    One, the dating app provider doesn't want you to find a match because you'd stop using the app, they want endless engagent.

    Two, I hear my younger coworkers and youth say they couldn't find a match, because none of them were good looking enough. So all the suggestions they ignored based on a picture. This really isn't how you find a good life partner, this skips interaction and personality connections that you get in live encounters.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, that part really shows the entire methodology of the article is bullshit.

    And then there’s the phrase. Post after post across the app uses some version of the same line: “he collects women like Pokémon cards.” That’s not a joke somebody made once. That’s the app’s house insult, used so often it might as well ship with the keyboard. The man on the receiving end doesn’t even have to play. You could have never touched a card in your life and still catch this one.

    They're proving that this instance of a negative mention of Pokemon doesn't even have to do with someone being interested in the hobby which is the entire premise of the article. But they never mention filtering for this, and then just go on to say that liking Pokemon is the worst hobby stats wise. Not that I'm expecting perfect methodology for something like this, but this is a pretty fucking glaring issue they even openly admit but somehow don't see the problem with it.

    Saying someone collects women like Pokemon cards is just an insult about someone being a player, it doesn't have anything to do with someone's hobbies. It could easily be said as collecting women like any other commonly collected item.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›