[–] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Give people candidates they want to vote for, and they do.

Every person who promoted "strategic voting", the kind that handed 2024 to Trump, this is your time to shut the fuck up about what it takes to win elections. If a candidate doesnʻt have the right issues, the candidate needs to move or change. Thats it. The debate is over.

The concept of strategic voting is a liberal approach to appeasement which gives status quo politicians who no one likes a hall pass to continue to be bad at being politicians. Strategic voting as game theory is bad game theory because its implementation results in the opposite of the outcomes it alleges. It also makes the assumption, from an implicitly white supremacist vision, of what the lessor harm represents. Its utterly bunk and any one who promoted it instead of advocating that candidates move on their positions is in the back seat for the rest of time. I never want to hear it again. Its a disastrous approach to elections, and when you instead, put forward candidates with policies people want, or move politicians to adopting positions people want, you win elections. Its basic fucking politics and we did not need to suffer through this era of fascism because of white supremacist liberals pushing their failed vision of how to win elections. Everything about November 3rd proves them wrong,.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

    Folks are going to learn fast trans leopards exist, and voters can be transphobic. South Carolina got a transphobe Senator. Arizona, Washington, and Colorado implemented antitrans legislation. Democrats are not supporting trans folk. Etc. etc..

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 6 days ago

    I thought they is inclusive not exclusive and not necessarily an identifier per se. Like, it's been used that way forever etc. being the case made to use it as a natural, respectful, go to for all people. Has she asked not to be referred to this way specifically or have I misinterpreted something?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 30 points 6 days ago (1 child)

    Rigsby repeatedly targeted Montgomery’s transgender identity during the closing days of the election. Montgomery responded by emphasizing that voters were more concerned about everyday challenges facing Alabama families.

    This is the strategy Democrats nationwide have always needed to play. Don't cave on culture war bullshit; pivot to the issues people actually care about. People care about things like inflation and data centers a lot more than they ever cared about anything related to transgender people.

  • source
  • view more: next ›