I thought they is inclusive not exclusive and not necessarily an identifier per se. Like, it's been used that way forever etc. being the case made to use it as a natural, respectful, go to for all people. Has she asked not to be referred to this way specifically or have I misinterpreted something?

@master@sh.itjust.works , correct me if i'm wrong, but i interpretted the "they/them" in those last two sentences as the collective of Alabama