[–] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not like I want to argue, generally curious. What does Excel do that Calc doesn't?

I work with text a lot, so I'm good with Writer (or Word), but I rarely do anything advanced in Calc or Excel, for basic stuff Calc is fine. I really don't know enough to compare the two.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 40 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    their preferred office suite

    Usually it's not "their preferred office suite" but "office suite they are forces to use at work". MS Office usage is high because of network effect, not because any other office suite is worse.

    I use LO Writer for any document I write (or work with) myself and it's perfectly fine. The only reason I keep MS Office is that I need to work on documents other people write (or need to work with).

    Of course there are people who actually prefer MS Office, but it's similar to Windows itself: most people did not choose it, they either don't know there is an alternative or are forced to use it for compatibility reasons (at work). It's rare that anyone actually "prefers" MS software.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 child)

    To be honest I never thought of that and this looks like exactly what I need. Do you know if it works with subdomains, so if I add example.com to exceptions will it also store cookies from subdomain.example.com ? However I'm not sure if cookies are being stored by a subdomain or the main domain for some sites, for example there are sites that host user's blog at user.website.com .

    Also I wish there was a button in address bar or somewhere else to simply click and "Add an exception to allow storing cache and cookies".

    UPD: Press Alt, go to Tools -> Page info (or press Ctril+I) -> Permissions, there is a button to Allow Set Cookies there.

    Thank you very much, I never noticed such a setting!

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 6 months ago (3 children)

    Can you tell me more about where do I disable cookies and add exceptions for sites which I do want to store cookies? Does this also remove data other than cookeis (cache, local storage etc.)?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    Hello everyone.

    This is a "need help" or "ELI5" post, hope anyone can be nice and explain me.

    So, one thing about Firefox (and web browsing in general) I do is, I use private browsing mode, almost all the time. I have a "normal" firefox window with a few tabs I use daily, and a second firefox window which is in private browsing. I use it to just do everything else: dive into rabbit holes, open links, do a web search, watch a youtube video etc.

    I do it mainly for privacy reasons, I don't want websites to track me, fingerprint me etc. I also don't want to store any cookies and stuff.

    I'm mostly satisfied with the workflow I have, but the one problem is that sometimes firefox will update and ask for a restart, or maybe crash, or maybe I need to reboot my laptop or it will get discharge and turn off, then I lose all of my open tabs. Sometimes I can copy the URLs of tabs I want to keep, and open them again after a restart, sometimes I can't. I'm mostly ok with starting fresh, however sometimes I'm a bit sad about losing the tabs I liked or did not finish reading.

    I think my "always open everything in private mode" workflow makes more problems than it solves. The thing is, I do not understand how normal mode behaves when compared to private browsing mode. I know there's "Enhanced Protection" and "Total Protection" modes in settings, but how do they work compared to private browsing? Also there's a button to clear cookies, but there's many other things other than cookies, such as session storage, indexed DB storage, cache etc. When I use private browsing, I 100% know everything about the site I had open gets destroyed. This means if I open a youtube and watch a minecraft video, I won't get full home page of minecraft video recommendations next time I open youtibe again, if I use private browsing mode.

    Can I achieve this without private browsing? I think I can use a container, but in this case I would basically want every single tab I open be in a separate container, and this is way too much work to do manually. Also I would want containers to be destroyed after I close the tab.

    (The only exception to every tab being in their own container is when I open a link to the same domain from withing a container, for example if I go from reddit homepage in a "temporary reddit container" to a reddit post in a new tab, I would want that post tab be in the same container)

    I know there exists an extension called temporary containers, but last time I tried it, I think it had some weird behaviors: IIRC after a browser restart every tab that was open in a temporary container, got reopened outside of containers (so my browser became "dirty" with all the cookies and cache and etc. of every tab I had open in temporary containers previously).

    I've heard somewhere (probably reddit Firefox sub) that either enhanced or total protection mode basically do what I want: they make every domain/subdomain to be isolated and behave as if each site had it's own container. Is that true? Then the only thing I would need is a way to destroy site data when there's no open tabs that use said data.

    TL:DR; How do I make all randomly open tabs in my browser to not keep their data (cookies, cache, other local stored data) after I close the tab as if I was opening them in private mode? Not being kept in browsing history would also be nice, but that I can clean manually from time to time.

     

    Hello everyone.

    It's been quite some time since I installed Linux alongside Windows, and recently I mostly just use Linux.

    I made a mistake when partitioning my drive, multiple times. I tried dualboot on my previous machines in past and time and time again the same happens: I think "well linux is lightweight" and give it like a 50 GB partition, then realize it's not enough.

    I think I managed to shrink my windows partition and grow my linux root partition once, however I don't remember how I did that exactly.

    Now I'm thinking of a way to backup my windows partition and move it to an external USB drive, to reformat it for linux use, but still be able to boot into windows, maybe via VM? Is it doable?

    My current partitions:

    nvme0n1     259:0    0 476.9G  0 disk               # the only drive in my laptop
    ├─nvme0n1p1 259:1    0     1G  0 part /boot         # I think this is an "UEFI" partition, not sure if I can touch it in any way
    ├─nvme0n1p2 259:2    0    16M  0 part               # This is "Microsoft reserved partition", it was automatically created by windows during installation, not sure if I can touch this
    ├─nvme0n1p3 259:3    0 129.4G  0 part /mnt/windows10    # my "C:\" partition with windows, ntfs, I want this to run in a VM or be bootable from external drive
    ├─nvme0n1p5 259:4    0    50G  0 part /             # My archlinux partition, ext4
    ├─nvme0n1p6 259:5    0  14.4G  0 part               # "WINDRIVER" partition, ntfs, I think it was there when I bought the laptop, not sure if can be touched in any way
    └─nvme0n1p7 259:6    0 282.1G  0 part /mnt/games    # btrfs partition for data shared between windows and linux, here's my steam library with games, btrfs because it's well supported by linux and windows (with a third party driver)
    

    What I ideally want:

    • Probably UEFI partition
    • 130 GB partition for archlinux, probably this should be ext4
    • 280 GB partition for non-system data (movies, music etc), probably btrfs
    • 50 GB partition for /home, probably btrfs as well
    • Windows 10 as a bootable live USB or virtual drive that can be run in a VM stored on external USB stick

    What are my options?

    Is it possible to backup windows partition in way that it can later be run in a VM or being booted from external drive? Can I just format that partition into ext4, move my / partition files to the new partition and use it as my new root partition? I hope it won't break file permissions and stuff and "just work".

    What can I do safely to get rid of windows on my drive, but still keep the working system somewhere else in case I need the software (you know, adobe, corel, MS office etc.)?

    I'm not good with most of these things (partitions, can they be safely resized or moved around, backed up and restored, what's UEFI partition etc.).

    Before you say "just make a backup and do whatever you want", I understand that this is what I should ideally be doing, but unfortunately I don't have multiple huge drives just laying around, I only have 1 external SSD which does not have too much free space, so I'd like to find some optimal way to achieve this without having to buy terabytes of additional storage.

     

    This question probably relates to DeltaChat itself and not ArcaneChat specifically, but why not, I use Arcane so decided to just ask here.

    This post is probably just general questions, but I couldn't think of a better title, sorry.

    So, my only issue with Delta/Arcane is the same as with most modern software: I lack basic understanding. I know how to use it, it tries to be very user friendly and everything "just works", so there's no need to really know much about the app, as long as you don't need something that doesn't work as you want. Once this happens, you realize you just have no idea of how it works.

    My current understanding is that Delta/Arcane are some kind of email clients (like thunderbird) but with a focus on chatting (so you don't have features like folder management, but instead have a nice to use conversation UI instead). Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    When I test the app, for example install it to two devices and send a message from one to another, it works: a new chat appears with the message. It can also be seen as a regular email if you also use an email client, like thunderbird. I think it always lands in "INBOX/DeltaChat" folder. I'm not sure how this happens, does DeltaChat monitor for new emails and moves them into that folder, or there's somehow a way to include "this mail should land in this folder" instruction so that mail server itself does this.

    However when someone sends me a "regular" email, for example from thunderbird (and not through DeltaChat) it comes as a regular email in my INBOX folder and of course I don't see it as a chat in my ArcaneChat app.

    If we truly treat Delta/Arcane as a universal IM replacement, for example if I want to uninstall every IM (whatsapp, telegram) from my devices and when someone wants to contact me, I want to just give them my email and ask to send an email, if I don't want to be explaining them what DeltaChat is, I expect such emails to appear in my ArcaneChat app. How would I achieve this? Is there a way to manage what appears as a chat and what doesn't? I guess I wouldn't ask those questions if I understood the mechanism behind it: how DeltaChat messages are different from regular emails, how do they appear in DeltaChat folder etc.

    Please, I need some understanding and not just "press this button" type of instructions.

    view more: next ›