[–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

So I went through your post history to see if you were capable of independent thought and it turns out, not really…

Neopronouns, trains and pro Israel support with some L takes on tech makes you the most stereotypical Lemmy user I’ve encountered… no wonder you left Reddit for here. This is where all the trans autistic sysadmins who blindly support Israel congregate. Completely in your bubble and wildly drinking all the flavors of cool aid. Good for you Xir.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (3 children)

    It’s amazing that I’ve triggered you so much you’ve made assumptions on age. It’s unfortunate your brain rot can’t accept the dictionary’s definition:

    Heterosexual: sexually or romantically attracted to people of the other sex.

    I’m truly sorry they didn’t consult your feelings when writing the definition little snowflake

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    If this was Lithuania or Rhode Island I’m pretty sure they would, but both Apple and Google have massive presences in Texas, thousands of employees and many offices. It would not go well for them to “ban” them and have their assets seized and employees arrested.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It’s certainly not “disrespectful” to have sexual fantasies, stop gatekeeping desire you weirdo. It’s not even a fetishization, I find that to be an over complication of what’s really going on when straight men consider lesbian sex to be hot.

    The formula is quite simple (from the perspective of a man):

    1. The least sexy thing about sex is my participation in it as the man
    2. The most sexy thing about sex is the woman, regardless of what she’s doing

    Therefore when we crunch the numbers and Cary the zero, it becomes clear that there is no upper bound to the amount of women participants in sex but male participants should be capped.

    TLDR we like women

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›