I remember when postman used to bring little envelopes (sometimes little boxes) to people's homes and was paid by tax money and the small amount of postal fees we paid.
Should have checked the blame before running clang-format himself.
Yeah, I am the same.
I type the code myself, so I know what it actually means, instead of letting AI do it.
It might seem different now, but 10-20 years down the line, they might be the same energy.
AI CEOs might end up doing better, you know?
At least better than the type of human CEOs that decide to go full AI.
If you are talking about the picture being easier to read, then that's a renderer thing and is better off being fixed.
If you are talking about the code being easier to read, yes. The line I made has a 3 features vs the 1 feature in 1 line of the former, so it is to be expected. And that's why I don't expect people to make it themselves (although I do make it manually).
You seem to not be taking into consideration:
- lag
- extra information required for graphics stuff, like shadows
The reason your client computer needs to know the opponent's location when they are still 1m on the other side of the wall, is because, within the next 100ms, you might make a jump+move action which lets you see their shadow or the tip of their weapon.
The shadows and reflections need to be calculated on your system or the server would be doing too much work and if you find the opponent pop up where they clearly were not, 50ms ago (because the server just told you now), you won't be particularly happy either (I know I won't).
Well, guess I am not in that 60%.
But then again, I don't need new RAM for it. Everything other than the motherboard is already there and I can use an old ATI Radeon for the display.
Just here to say, there is an even better way to embed an xkcd in Lemmy Markdown.
[](https://xkcd.com/1105/)
This will not only make the image into a link but also give the much required hover text.
Like so...
Feel free to make a Python (or sth) snippet that creates the link for you.
I recently saw a picture of a SCSI connector when looking for PCIe - SATA cards.
Apparently most normal PCIe - SATA cards are very unreliable (somehow even worse than USB to SATA adapters), so I went on looking for the SCSI ones that have been reviewed as more reliable.
P.S. If anyone knows about a (non-RAID) PCIe - SATA card that I can rely upon as much as my motherboard SATA controller, then do tell.
dog robot maintainer
What maintainer?
There's no maintenance.
You just scrap the thingy and make a new one.
Yeah, this is one of the things I found out the hard (ok, it was too easy to call it "hard", but anyway) way.
Not particularly interested in opening YouTube though
No sad puppy face, either?