[–] 1 point 2 months ago
  1. Allows any and all LLM use provided that:
  • the tools are not legally problematic
  • the LLM output does not violate another copyright
  • the contributor assumes full responsibility
  • they're not used for bulk operations without prior discussion
  • private data is not sent to cloud services

So, filtering out > 90% of cheap slop?

I would like something like point 3, with "for everything" replaced with option 2.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Makes sense. Might be hard though.
    Would be a good idea to start by adding what types of programs you are good at, i.e. the projects.

    Also, there is no lack of OSS projects to work on. Take for instance:

    • LibreOffice
    • any of the project you might find on invent.kde.org and bugs.kde.org
    • Blender

    For paid work though, it becomes harder. You need to be good at advertising yourself correctly to the correct client and I (as someone who failed to advertise myself) am not the correct person to give suggestions on that.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    There was a doctor who said to me, "computer games can be addictive". This was after I told her I play games, so she was pretty much implying that I was getting addicted. This was when I hadn't played for over a month due to lack of time from my 9 to 6:30 job.
    The same doctor bragged about how she couldn't go about her day without drinking coffee right after waking up.

    She said those 2 things within the same 5 minutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: ‹ prev next ›