I don't know, it looks like the amount of issues is way higher than improvement in comfort. Beside, they mentioned a lot of corner cases that would definitely show up and become a problem
I've been using C++ for quite some time, and it also had some talks about having named parameters, but it only helps in some places and hinders in most, imo. I feel like in Rust you may use a struct as parameter containing all of function parameteres where you really want the names
But takes forever to set up (at least for me, when I set it up for cross compilation)
I don't think they often do, but in some places they are part of organised crime which may help with that
Okay then
I'm not sure they were made insufficient, as much as they couldn't be made sufficient
No shit, but she's also not running a country either
That's just a subject here
Slightly
scan next tombstone to proceed with installation
Judging by the sources list, it is based on how participants report themselves (including self-contradictory statements)
It would be sad if the archive were lost forever by now
I'm guessing, they mean the user of a future that already exists as it is, what you mean is you can implement a future that would provide a way for the code inside to know of being cancelled. But most of the time you don't do that, and a function that was polled once and then dropped will never know about that